From your statement, I assume that you have thoroughly tested all VistA
options in the 100+ different VistA modules to verify that VistA works fine
without them.
- Original Message -
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday,
Perhaps it is time for some people in the government to make changes. There
should be a web site where anyone can download any finished software product
developed by any federal agency. All agencies should be required to put
that software on the web site. Of course, there needs to be an
ways to
do this.
Lloyd
- Original Message -
From: smcphelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] There is a new FOIA CACHE.dat release as
of
Aug. 25
What does your perl command do
What does your perl command do that is different from:
S %DIRECTORY=appropriate value
D STRIPCR^ZOSVGUX(%DIRECTORY)
- Original Message -
From: Lloyd Milligan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 8:37 PM
Subject: Re:
This why the Kernel allowed the passing a some generic flags, like
W,A,R,etc. This way the application is device and M independent.
Obviously, the Kernel has not generalized all parameters that can be used in
all M implementations. This is an area for enhancement to the Kernel device
utilities.
I learned M years ago. I knew Fortran and Basic. I found that 80+% of the
commands and functions in M had equivalents in M. The M commands and
functions usually had more features than the equivalent Basic ones. But it
helped me to think in those terms, like Basic has a Print command and M has
Regarding several recent responses to this thread:
1. Can you explain why memory references are very slow but accessing global
caches (which is stored in memory) is very fast? Aren't they both
references to memory?
2. New programmers should stay away from indirection. You can easily get
into
Would it have something to do with flushing the buffers?
- Original Message -
From: Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Binary Read/Writes
I don't really understand this.
I got the same results as Kevin, I could not get to the page.
- Original Message -
From: Thurman Pedigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Rules for the List
I checked - short, succinct,
Non-printable ASCII characters in either the data or the global subscripts
can and has caused problem depending upon the M implementation and the
vehicle you are using to access the M account. If your data is on a global
node that only your specific application will touch, then you may get by
Here, here. Chris also stated this. ANSI standard M is not really designed
to handle binary data. This is one reason Intersystems added extensions (if
you wish to call it that). But then you are bound to a specific M vendor's
implementation, in this case, Cache.
If you are going to stay
Is your browser encoding the _ in mailing_list?
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A hero is no braver than an ordinary
man, but he is brave five minutes longer.
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
On Aug 21, 2005, at 4:11 AM, smcphelan wrote:
I got the same results as Kevin, I could not get
8. DO NOT spam the list with your advertising message. You will be banned
from the list if you do so.
If a company has a position open for a VistA knowledgeable person, is
placing a job announcement considered SPAM?
12. Do not forward copyrighted material or information you do not have
For this esoteric message, is left-to-right really easier for all people,
e.g., Israelis or anyone else who native language is to read right to left?
M was developed in the US so it is natural that that language adopted a
Western perspective.
- Original Message -
From: Holloway, Thomas
What is the difference between the ONE TIME you entered into the file and
the ONCE entry that already existed?
- Original Message -
From: Madhavi Bagepalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 10:14 AM
Subject: Re:
I believe that is so strictly within in confines of the M ANSI standard.
However, for the newbies, all M implementations I am familiar with allow for
what they call numeric collation in the globals. So when you $O() through
an array with numeric subscripts, those will collate prior to the
Medical images do have an additional area of security with which other
applications may not be concerned. One has to evaluate the risk if one does
not ensure somehow that an image is never modified or replaced. Again this
gets back to the legal aspect of the medical record. Every PACS vendor I
How do you accomplish this and still keep goodwill with the customer?
4. It's better to take MORE time in the design stage to get it right,
then having to go back and re-engineer the entire product.
5. All aspects of the design and code have to be traced to requirements,
if it isn't in a
Here, here - well stated. One thing that needs repeating is that one of
VistA's initial design specifications (and one that still exists) is that
ALL application code be implementation and platform independent. M vendors
and OS vendors may not prefer that the VA have been so insistent on this
Has any VA representatives without conflicts of interests taken the test to
certify that the test has no implicit biases and that the test does
accurately measure what it is intended to do?
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I do plan on taking the test. I have not talked to anyone else at DSS, but
I assume DSS will be participating. But I could not publicly state that
without first checking with the president of the company.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
You can refer them to the VSA and WorldVistA web sites. The VSA web site
already has a list of companies ready to assist.
http://www.vistasoftware.org/
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hardhats Sourceforge hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent:
I forgot to add that we are looking for
experienced VistA adpacs also.
- Original Message -
From:
steven mcphelan
To: hardhats
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 4:44 PM
Subject: [Hardhats-members] JOB
OPPORTUNITY
Document Storage Systems, Inc is looking for
I do not know who set up the HFS device(s) on the FOIA. I vaguely remember
a patch quite awhile ago to OR (I think) that provided instructions for all
VAMCs to create a HFS device. So a HFS device is standardized in the VA.
When you use Fileman to do a lookup on the device file, the input value
You should also upgrade to the latest version.
On Thursday 23 June 2005 01:41 pm, Dan wrote:
Anyone know if VPE supports Cache?
We've converted DSM accounts to Cache-VMS and after I do anything
VPE
(..vgl, ..vedd, ..vrr, etc.) I get a NOLINE error. Running VPE
v10
VPE Error Trap:
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning
smcphelan wrote:
Having things spread across multiple partitions (or namespaces or volume
sets or whatever) does increase the management complexity of the system.
However routines
$$LGR^%ZOSV
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to save a nake reference?
I believe there's an entry point in %ZOSV to call the platform
The partitioning of the globals is or is not needed. For a single doctor's
office with 2-5 users, it probably does not make sense. For a serious
implementation at a sizeable medical center (or an outpatient clinic with
many providers) it makes absolutely perfect sense. If you look at the
larger
What Nancy is requesting is a Release of Information functionality. There
is no HIPAA compliant electronic function within the FOIA VistA. However,
Document Storage Systems, Inc does have an add-on module to VistA to provide
this functionality. This is what the VA has purchased to meet its ROI
The only thing that make sense to me is that you do not have read/write
privileges to those other directories. All %ZISH is doing is issuing an
OPEN command. Perhaps there is some peculiarities of the OPEN command
syntax within GT.M that %ZISH is not honoring. But I do not believe that is
the
:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Is there a way to print out a complete
patient record?
Are you saying that VistA is not HIPAA compliant
without a commercial add-on?
Kevin
--- smcphelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Nancy is requesting is a Release of Information
functionality
is it now presumably in the public domain or is it proprietary?
On Friday 17 June 2005 08:11 am, smcphelan wrote:
What Nancy is requesting is a Release of Information functionality.
There
is no HIPAA compliant electronic function within the FOIA VistA.
However,
Document Storage Systems, Inc
DSM is a dead implementation of M as Intersystems
has no plans for any further upgrades. Cache does have that
ability.
- Original Message -
From:
Gregory Woodhouse
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:48
PM
Subject: Re:
As Rick Marshall knows, I will challenge what is said in a publicforum especially one where many recipient's have little to noexperience withVistA and who do not really know who the people are who areresponding.Saying that, Kevin started this thread with thecomment: " I may havejustreinvented the
showed. Can you give an example that you feel
my function would not be able to do?
Kevin
--- smcphelan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is nice you have developed a M API to convert
dates. Everything you show
here (except for the at exactly) has been part of
VistA for 10 years or
more
It is nice you have developed a M API to convert dates. Everything you show
here (except for the at exactly) has been part of VistA for 10 years or
more... See XLFDT it is more robust than what you show here.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hardhats
And how are you going to adhere to HIPAA with your printing? As I
understand it, an audit record needs to be keep for each print out.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hardhats Sourceforge hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005
Bhaskar's suggestion would be a nice solution if that is what BCMA does.
The BCMA backup program does not relay all relevant information for the EHR
for that patient. It only backups up that data that is relevant for the
function of giving medication to inpatients only, not all patients. So it
of updates.
--- Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps the glass is half fulllcouldn't BCMA functionality be
extended to address the rest of the data and patient popn'??
smcphelan wrote:
Bhaskar's suggestion would be a nice solution if that is what BCMA
does.
The BCMA
39 matches
Mail list logo
