Re: [Hardhats-members] Broker patch XWB1.1.35

2005-02-12 Thread Nancy Anthracite
Yes, Putty can do it. On Saturday 12 February 2005 09:47 pm, Kevin Toppenberg wrote: > OK, now I think I am following you. I wasn't thinking > of port forwarding as tunneling. Sorry. I think you > would have to do that, as someone wrote that the RPC > broker communications are in clear-text.

Re: [Hardhats-members] Broker patch XWB1.1.35

2005-02-12 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
OK, now I think I am following you. I wasn't thinking of port forwarding as tunneling. Sorry. I think you would have to do that, as someone wrote that the RPC broker communications are in clear-text. But right now I don't know how to do port forwarding with SSH. Can PuTTY do this? Kevin --

Re: [Hardhats-members] Broker patch XWB1.1.35

2005-02-12 Thread Nancy Anthracite
Yes, I have done that - put the server out in the DMZ and had someone connect CPRS to it, but I did not consider what I did to be secure. However, with port forwarding (tunneling), and private key public key authentication, I think it could be made secure. I think what you have done to CPRS co

Re: [Hardhats-members] Broker patch XWB1.1.35

2005-02-12 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Nancy, I'm still not completely following you here. I think you are saying that you want to set up one server that everyone could connect to, so we could colaborate. The only need for port forwarding would be if the server is behind a firewall. But one could also make the server secure (i.e. sh

Re: [Hardhats-members] Broker patch XWB1.1.35

2005-02-11 Thread Nancy Anthracite
Just speculating on remote connections securely, using open source resources, over an Internet connection. I think port forwarding would work, but for that, you need a fixed port, so I am wondering about whether or not there is a way to do it without having to fix up and recompile CPRSChart ev

Re: [Hardhats-members] Broker patch XWB1.1.35

2005-02-11 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Nancy, I'm too lazy to read the documentation right now. But I will tell you that I'm pretty sure that the client specifies which port the server is to call back on. So I don't know that a server patch would fix that. What is your motivation in this issue? What problem are you working on? Kev

[Hardhats-members] Broker patch XWB1.1.35

2005-02-11 Thread Nancy Anthracite
Is this patch the patch to allow connections on a limited number of ports? I can't quite follow all of it, so I would like a guru to explain it in a way I can follow, please - i.e., dumb it down big time, please. The documentation is in the RPC Broker section of the VDL. -- Nancy Anthracite