Thanks, Greg. I appreciate you taking the
time to explain this.
- Original Message -
From:
Greg Kreis
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:21
AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan
in Cache
The effect you are
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris
Richardson
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 7:26 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache
Nancy;
The global listed does not look like a valid Fileman Global structure,
(but it is a fine MUMPS global just th
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache
It is not undocumented (you can always associate a label with a field)
and it has nothing to do with Cache. Printing in Fileman is unrelated
to the global lister.
--- Bob Beckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, Marianne. Tha
llingstad
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 8:29 PM
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache
>
>
> FM only prints the higher level entry once when printing subfile
> info. If
> you want the higher level inf
Kreis Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 7:27 PM To:
hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members]
FileMan in Cache
The Cache display of globals that suppresses the subscripts is just a
formatting choice. It is just how they chose to present them. It
doesn't
27;s it coming
from,
then? Weird, huh? Thanks for your time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Greg
Kreis
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 7:27 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache
The Cach
global list utility does not yield the difference in
the subsequent nodes.
- Original Message -
From: "Nancy E. Anthracite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache
> Bob Witkop from Intersystems
t: Sunday, January 30, 2005 7:27 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache
The Cache display of globals that suppresses the subscripts is just a
formatting choice. It is just how they chose to present them. It
doesn't influence how global
d the difference in
the subsequent nodes.
- Original Message -
From: "Nancy E. Anthracite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan in Cache
> Bob Witkop from Intersystems hangs his hat here at times, so
The Cache display of globals that suppresses the subscripts is just a
formatting choice. It is just how they chose to present them. It
doesn't influence how globals work or how FM works.
FM can be made to suppress repeating values in a column through the use
of a suffix of ";N" for a field spe
Bob Witkop from Intersystems hangs his hat here at times, so he will see this.
On Sunday 30 January 2005 02:25 pm, Bob Beckley wrote:
> If you look at a global listing in the Cache/VMS environment, you'll notice
> that the global array to the left of the "=" sign is listed only once.
> Subsequen
If you look at a global listing in the Cache/VMS environment, you'll notice
that the global array to the left of the "=" sign is listed only once.
Subsequent entries with the same global array are blank to the left of the
"=" sign, with "new" data to the right, like so:
^ABC(1,"ID")=123^124
12 matches
Mail list logo
