-Sun VM options.
/David.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cameron Schlehuber
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 10:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] GT.M inside (was Krung Thai Bank goes
live on GT.M)
The emphasis
t at least there are non-Sun VM options.
/David.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cameron Schlehuber
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 10:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] GT.M inside (was Krung Thai Bank goes
li
bject: Re: [Hardhats-members] GT.M inside (was Krung Thai Bank goes live
on GT.M)
I just got off the phone with my son who informed me that Sun's Java has a
restricted license - look but don't touch - but there are truly open source
versions of Java. So is the VA making any distinction i
Kevin --
GT.M automatically links a module on the first call, but not thereafter,
unless you do an explicit relink with a ZLink. The cause of the
performance hit lies elsewhere.
Perhaps GT.M's trace capability can help? For example, try:
View "TRACE":1:^Trace($Job)
... whatever ...
Vie
Bhaskar,
This may be a bit off topic (re licensing), but it
does relate to the linking.
I recently divided my program up into modules, with a
bunch of debug code all grouped into one TMGDEBUG.m
file. When I did this, I noticed that my execution
speed went way down. It seemed that the module is
I just got off the phone with my son who informed me that Sun's Java has a
restricted license - look but don't touch - but there are truly open source
versions of Java. So is the VA making any distinction in what they are
using? Does it matter to us if we start writing GUI plugins for Pedi th
Maury --
There are several cases of linking to consider with GT.M for x86
GNU/Linux.
The most common is the default, when a process executes a Do ^XYZ or a
ZLINK "XYZ". This is dynamically linked.
With GT.M the top level of a process does not have to be M code, but can
be in C (or another langu
Bhaskar,
As long as you have the hood up, I'd like to ask about GT.M with respect to
"linking". As you know, the recent conversations about open source licensing
touched on the issue of static versus dynamic linking. This seems to be the
line that separates "contaminated" from "uncontaminated
