I'm not opposed to moving the language forward.
I think it could be done in a way that would identify the new code as
new, and use different syntax.
Such as put SYNTAX NEW or something at the beginning of the source code.
And we can call the language M++ :-)
Kevin
On 8/23/05, Greg Woodhouse
ANYTHING but M++!
Actually, I had in mind tagging the object code as old (or version 1,
which sounds much better).
--- Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not opposed to moving the language forward.
I think it could be done in a way that would identify the new code as
new, and use
VistA.
Jim Gray
- Original Message -
From: James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] MUMPS and VistA ( more M read questions)
I want to say that I agree very much with what you
how about M# or MOOL?:-)
On 8/23/05, Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 12:15, Greg Woodhouse wrote:
ANYTHING but M++!
Call it longhorn
Ruben
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better
OHOHOHOH!
I got this one!
Call it paramyxovirus
or...
maybe...
live attenuated mumps that way people know it isn't as virulent!!!
Or... maybe I will just be quiet again
BTW... Kevin... can you call external routines or system functions in
mumps?
If so...
