RE: [Hardhats-members] GNU GPL and comments

2004-11-20 Thread Daniel Gray
Yes, remind us again of why we are all here !! Hear, Hear !! Harumph, Harumph!! Along those same lines, wouldn't it be ironic (maybe smart) if some WorldVistA member or group of members would apply to a grant from Gates Foundation. I understand the request process there is reasonable, not oner

Re: [Hardhats-members] GNU GPL and comments

2004-11-20 Thread Jim Self
The essential feature of the GNU General Public License (GPL) is a defensive mechanism intended to preserve and protect the integrity and status of GPL licensed software as a public resource against covert appropriation and dissemination as someone's proprietary body of work. Thus ideas of antib

Re: [Hardhats-members] GNU GPL and comments

2004-11-19 Thread Nancy E. Anthracite
It gets the name from hostname -s. In my system, that traces back to /etc/hosts and to set the name to Morphix, for instance, this is what you have to do in the file: # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 Morphix.

Re: [Hardhats-members] GNU GPL and comments

2004-11-19 Thread T Maynard
I am impressed by Bhaskar's valient effort to metaphorically immunize early against the use of the catchy word "viral" . To carry the metaphor to Rabies, if you are early enough with the "shots" , you can promote an antibody response before the infectious agent really takes hold. So this post

Re: [Hardhats-members] GNU GPL and comments

2004-11-19 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
Comments below. -- Bhaskar On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 20:54, Joel West wrote: [KSB] <...snip...> > * do you want a "viral" term or not, i.e. one that requires changes to > be given back (GPL) or not (BSD, Apache) > * do you want the "viral" clause to apply to new versions of the code > (as say the L

Re: [Hardhats-members] GNU GPL and comments (was: that LONG Pedi thread)

2004-11-16 Thread Joel West
Since I've done some research on open source licenses, I wanted to add my 2 cents worth. The no brainer is to choose from the Open Source Initiative approved licenses, which include the GPL, LGPL, Mozilla Public License, Apache, BSD and Common Public License. The full list of 50+ can be found a

Re: [Hardhats-members] GNU GPL and comments (was: that LONG Pedi thread)

2004-11-15 Thread steven mcphelan
In using terms, everyone must be precise. In Crawford's responses he kept mentioning VistA. VistA is the FOIA version of the VA product. Any vendor can take that FOIA version and do anything they wish without concerns about GPL since the VA FOIA VistA is not GPL. So when talking about a GPL ver