Re: [H] Email SMTP server issue

2006-11-18 Thread Gary VanderMolen
It's doing its part. If the anti-spam tactics weren't being used, you'd see at least 10 times as much spam in your inbox as you do now. Gary VanderMolen - Original Message - > doesn't seem to be working >:-} > fp > At 07:31 PM 11/18/2006, Gary VanderMolen Poked the stick with: >>> The wh

Re: [H] Email SMTP server issue

2006-11-18 Thread FORC5
doesn't seem to be working >:-} fp At 07:31 PM 11/18/2006, Gary VanderMolen Poked the stick with: >> The whole blocking thing is really obnoxious... > >But a necessary tactic in the war against spammers. > >Gary VanderMolen -- Tallyho ! ]:8) Taglines below ! -- Forget RTFM - Call the author at

Re: [H] Email SMTP server issue

2006-11-18 Thread Gary VanderMolen
> The whole blocking thing is really obnoxious... But a necessary tactic in the war against spammers. Gary VanderMolen

Re: [H] Email SMTP server issue

2006-11-18 Thread Scott Sipe
I've also occasionally seen people using port 2525 for backup SMTP. The whole blocking thing is really obnoxious... Scott On Nov 17, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Gary VanderMolen wrote: Many SMTP mail servers now allow use of alternate port 587, which is not blocked. Gmail is one example of this. Gary

Re: [H] Email SMTP server issue

2006-11-18 Thread Rick Glazier\(Gmail\)
Some ISPs will allow sending IF you do an authenticated pick-up first, and then do an authenticated send right after that. There is also the extendedSMTP (ESMTP) "way" of using higher numbered ports (with or with-out authentication - YMMV) that will work IF the particular ISP supports that.