Ok, that all makes sense to me, even as slow as I am.
Will give it a try tomorrow.
Thanks again, Harvey
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com> Subject: Re: [H] OT
> Networking question somewhat different> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:48:55
> -0800> > >There is no modem. Jus
But I 'll bet several thousand small files which
always takes long than
a few huge files totaling the same size.
My guess is xcopy is better since it's not using
clipboard to do cut &
paste.
Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
> ok..92 GBbut surely others here have even bigger
loads...
>
> "Anth
>There is no modem. Just a line from the antenna
>that is networked size and plugs into the network
>card of the computer.
The base of the antenna must have a built-in modem.
Is it powered?
Try this: from the computer currently wired to the
antenna, go to a command prompt and enter
ipconfig /a
Hey thanks, now I have 3 things to try. Still looking for a ISP that has
wireless to see what they say. Might not be the same, but it would probably be
close.
Thanks again, Harvey
> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:25:14 -0700> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re
just a guess but perhaps the wify setup uses a fixed ip and you may need to
input the info into the router on the WAN side. sort of like a T1 line. May
need the ip and dns settings which should be in the computer if this is how it
is set up. Then the router would handle downstream.
fp
At 02:07
Okay, more info, (The Web page of the ISP does not have any info, tried that
the first time, and calls going unreturned, assuming holiday delays).
There is no modem. Just a line from the antenna that is networked size and
plugs into the network card of the computer. I took that cable and plugg
The wireless ISP (WISP) should have a web page that explains how
to setup for networking.
Try this in the meantime:
Assuming that the modem is already doing NAT and DHCP,
connect the line from the modem to a LAN jack on the router instead of
the WAN jack. That way you'll be using the router as a si
Right off hand I would say that another nic in the computer would be able to
share to a switch and the computer would be the firewall, sort of old
fashioned but it would work.
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harvey Best
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 3
Hi,
Friend of mine in an area with dial up only, just got a wireless (high speed)
Internet connection. There is an area antenna and at his house there is a small
antenna aimed at the community antenna. From the house antenna there is a
network cable that runs to the network card on his desktop
Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 06:42 PM 29/12/2006, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
> >Well, the xcopy /richkey inside a cmd box did the job in about 2
> >hours, for 92 GB. I'm very pleased with that rate. I'll use that
> >from now on when moving/building systems for myself.
>
At 06:42 PM 29/12/2006, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Well, the xcopy /richkey inside a cmd box did the job in about 2
hours, for 92 GB. I'm very pleased with that rate. I'll use that
from now on when moving/building systems for myself.
You could also try xxcopy (www.xxcopy.com) which does a bett
"Just controls the access list" that is what
Clinton calls IS is :-)
ACL's are what control access to the file system based
on your user &
group membership. PERIOD.
I don't see how CACLS (or XCACLS) would not work for
what it's for, and
is verifiable, which is setting & reading ACL's.
Havi
12 matches
Mail list logo
