I am thinking about buying a 30 inch dell monitor,
http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?c=us&l=en&cs=19&oc=W3007
In fact, if I could just buy it and just plug it in and go I would
do it, but it is never that simple. I am currently running dual 3.06
Xeon with a AGP ATI X800 All
http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/02/06OPsecadvise_1.html?source=NLC-STOADV2007-02-05
This article suggests that MS is far more secure than we think
because it has had fewer known vulnerabilities - I would think the
mertic should be: the severity of each vulnerability * the number of
days
Hello Thane,
Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:40:46 PM, you wrote:
> This article suggests that MS is far more secure than we think
I think, to use the words Microsoft and secure in the same sentence is
ludicrous.
--
Regards,
joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...
That would make sense. Everytime I've had issues with
Comcast not
sending it has been DNS related as they try to contact
the DNS & mail
servers of the target domain BEFORE they allow the
email client to send
the message.
Could be it's taking longer than 60sec for the mail
server's protection
t
Secure & Internet attached ARE oxymorons, add
Microsoft and you have an
Uber-Oxymoron.
Joe User wrote:
> Hello Thane,
>
> Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:40:46 PM, you wrote:
>
>> This article suggests that MS is far more secure
than we think
>
> I think, to use the words Microsoft and secure in
- Original Message -
From: "Thane Sherrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:40 PM
Subject: [H] Vulnerability counts
http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/02/06OPsecadvise_1.html?source=NLC-STOADV2007-02-05
This article suggests that MS is far more secu
