Re: [H] free - simple - smtp

2007-04-23 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 08:59 PM 21/04/2007, Joe User wrote: I have a sonicwall I wish to have email logs to me. Sonicwall doesn't support SMTP authentication (duh), So I want to setup a free and simple SMTP server that I can restrict by IP. This will prevent it from becoming a spam / open relay email server. Like

Re: [H] Best DVD/CD burning SW?

2007-04-23 Thread Hayes Elkins
From: JRS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com CC: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Best DVD/CD burning SW? Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:43:14 -0700 Nothing's wrong with Nero 6.6,

Re[2]: [H] free - simple - smtp

2007-04-23 Thread Joe User
Hello Thane, Monday, April 23, 2007, 7:06:33 AM, you wrote: Like this? http://www.softstack.com/freesmtp.html http://www.postcastserver.com/ Yeah, thanks Hayes Thane - I should have mentioned I searched and tried google suggestions. That softstack deal is way to basic and also it's a

Re[2]: [H] free - simple - smtp

2007-04-23 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 11:52 AM 23/04/2007, Joe User wrote: tried google suggestions. That softstack deal is way to basic and also it's a spammer tool. Postcast ain't free and it looks suspicious too. Postcast has a free version, and I just installed it to test. Appears legit, but I'll report back once I've

Re: Re[2]: [H] free - simple - smtp

2007-04-23 Thread tmservo
I'm trying to think of that pos that most vps providers offer. Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless -Original Message- From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:13:09 To:Joe User [EMAIL PROTECTED], The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com

Re[3]: [H] free - simple - smtp

2007-04-23 Thread Joe User
Hello Thane, Monday, April 23, 2007, 10:13:09 AM, you wrote: Postcast has a free version, and I just installed it to test. Appears legit, but I'll report back once I've used it a bit. If you could I would appreciate it. I would also be interested to know if it can restrict by IP address.

Re[3]: [H] free - simple - smtp

2007-04-23 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 01:16 PM 23/04/2007, Joe User wrote: If you could I would appreciate it. I would also be interested to know if it can restrict by IP address. It does restrict by IP - you can enter a list of IPs that are accepted. T

[H] SATA controller

2007-04-23 Thread Gary Udstrand
I have a PC and 2x500G SATA drives, to which I plan to add another two, that I want to build as a NAS Server (FreeNAS). The PC does not have a SATA controller so I will need to add one, any recommendations? Thanks -- -Gary

Re: [H] SATA controller

2007-04-23 Thread tmservo
Or a silicon image on a card I know works with freenas. (Naslite is -so- much better, but that's a different story) Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless -Original Message- From: Gary Udstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:23:33 To:The Hardware List

Re: [H] SATA controller

2007-04-23 Thread Gary Udstrand
I could be convinced to use NASLite. :-) What advantage does it offer over FreeNAS? Would its use make a difference on the SATA controller recomendation? BTW, thanks for the info! I really appreciate it! g On 4/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or a silicon image on a

Re[4]: [H] free - simple - smtp

2007-04-23 Thread Joe User
Hello Thane, Monday, April 23, 2007, 11:22:38 AM, you wrote: It does restrict by IP - you can enter a list of IPs that are accepted. Hot dog... I found the free version, must missed that the first time. Well, my current solution, while overkill, is working fine. I am going to download this

Re: [H] SATA controller

2007-04-23 Thread Bryan Seitz
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:51:01AM -0500, Gary Udstrand wrote: I could be convinced to use NASLite. :-) What advantage does it offer over FreeNAS? Would its use make a difference on the SATA controller recomendation? BTW, thanks for the info! I really appreciate it! Promise makes

RE: [H] SATA controller

2007-04-23 Thread Hayes Elkins
Silicon Image and Marvell are what intel sometimes uses on their own retail boards. I would make sure that the board you pick has active driver development/support for Vista. From: Gary Udstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com To: The Hardware List

RE: [H] SATA controller

2007-04-23 Thread Greg Sevart
Promise doesn't make great anything. I've had much better luck with generic cards using Silicon Image chips. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan Seitz Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:35 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] SATA

Re: [H] SATA controller

2007-04-23 Thread Bryan Seitz
I've used promise PCI to ATA and PCI to SATA for MANY years with the best compatability in both linux AND windows. The SI chipset is also good. I agree most of their other products stink. On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 06:31:24PM -0500, Greg Sevart wrote: Promise doesn't make great anything. I've

RE: [H] SATA controller

2007-04-23 Thread Jin-Wei Tioh
At 06:31 PM 4/23/2007, you wrote: Promise doesn't make great anything. I've had much better luck with generic cards using Silicon Image chips. Eh, their Ultra100 and Ultra133 controllers were okay. At least they worked in pairs ;) The generic Silicon Image SATA controllers are great though