The press is going crazy about this. Unless there's been new testing since,
the original report of 10% faster was ONE test performed by ONE person on
ONE application suite--Office 2007. I very much doubt that SP3 is going to
bring sweeping performance gains across the board.
Yay, Word is 10%
Saving links inside the MS site is very often (YMMV) a waste of time.
They use active pages that are all changed in real time through
a changing database program structure/thinggy...
(Someone else will have to explain that better... grin)
Rick Glazier
From:
what they failed to say was 07 was 20% slower to start. :-}
fp
At 06:48 AM 12/5/2007, Greg Sevart Poked the stick with:
The press is going crazy about this. Unless there's been new testing since,
the original report of 10% faster was ONE test performed by ONE person on
ONE application
What's the problem with DRM? If you buy cheap CDs and rip yourself, you
never worry about it...if you really want to kill off DRM, don't buy
online digital media. Buy CD and DVDs and make your own.
Wayne Johnson wrote:
At 08:48 12-05-2007, Greg Sevart typed:
Yay, Word is 10% faster. Who
Try
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/ie6/downloads/critical/ie6sp1/default.ms
px
Rick Quilhot
IT Manager
J. America Retail Products
2 Industrial Park
Williamston, MI 48895
517.655.8800 x 102 (phone)
517.655.8801 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The did get rid of the kill switch, which is funny. At this point, if
someone came up with reliable DX10 on XP, Vista would be dead (IMHO).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 8:43 AM
To:
This blog posting sums up my thoughts on the whole WGA / Vista kill
switch thing exactly:
http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2007/12/dear-microsoft-this-is-why-people.html
On Dec 5, 2007 12:25 PM, Chris Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The did get rid of the kill switch, which is funny. At this
LOL! Not to mention lost productivity in relearning the interface. POS.
T
At 01:03 PM 05/12/2007, FORC5 wrote:
what they failed to say was 07 was 20% slower to start. :-}
fp
At 06:48 AM 12/5/2007, Greg Sevart Poked the stick with:
The press is going crazy about this. Unless there's been new
Rick,
Thank you for the link. Somehow during the long WinUpdate session,
MS decided to find and just install IE6.0. It came down and is all good
now. But, am saving you link for any rebuilds in the future.
Best,
Duncan
At 12:55 12/05/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Try
Someone here reported using it several weeks ago, IIRC.
zaske wrote:
Are there any MSDN or Technet subscribers on the list that have tried
the new beta of WinXP SP3? Its supposed to be much faster.
shrug People are still benching XP against Vista? That's
silly. We already know that XP is faster. (Now to be fair, the
machine only had 1GB of RAM. Had it been bumped to 2GB, Vista may
have done better.)
T
At 01:21 PM 05/12/2007, JRS wrote:
Not sure, but I read somewhere that XP with
Are there any MSDN or Technet subscribers on the list that have tried
the new beta of WinXP SP3? Its supposed to be much faster.
12 matches
Mail list logo
