Re: [H] Digital TV buying

2009-10-09 Thread DSinc
Bino, Believe you mean "little bro." I did so agonize back then trying to find the extra 1.5 inches (aesthetic) I needed for the 61" Pro. Did not happen! LOL I rarely sit and do COA long term calculations. If I did, I might have never dabbled in this computer "money-pit!" So much for tha

Re: [H] Digital TV buying

2009-10-09 Thread Bino Gopal
Hehe, you have the big bro to my 61" one! ;) I wanted that one, but with the space that I have the 61" is almost too big, so couldn't have done the 67"; oh well! :P Blu-ray is awesome but it does HDTV really well too (and I mostly watch TV on TW cable since I have 7 DVR tuners in the LR currently

Re: [H] Digital TV buying

2009-10-09 Thread DSinc
Anthony, You are so correct. And, I value all the comments on this List much more than all the "reviews" I haveread , and may still read. I know I will be fully satisfied with whatever toy I buy. And, WE will be able to kibbutz about personal preferences (choices!) for years to come. You are

Re: [H] Digital TV buying

2009-10-09 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
I have one of those DLP LED Samsungs...67-inches of gorgeousness, but no longer made. Great for high-def TV and blu ray. Watching BSG on Bluray now. Fantastic. Sometimes, old things dying works to your advantage, because I swore I would not buy another TV until my last one died. It didn't qu

Re: [H] Digital TV buying

2009-10-09 Thread DSinc
Greg/Bino, Thanks for the concise answer. I only shared what I see in ads for the past many months. Now I know that "240Hz is hype." Off to look at choices, and, figure out what to do with the very large Pioneer hulk! Best, Duncan Greg Sevart wrote: 120Hz provided real value. Being a multipl