Re: [H] Network issue

2010-04-24 Thread Gaffer
On Friday 23 April 2010 23:33:50 Winterlight wrote: > OK, now I have replaced that router = Linksys WG54 with another > Linksys WG54 that I updated the firmware on and checked it out as > working well. Then I set it up for my Network = DHCP at defaults > 192.168.1.1, disabled wireless completely, g

Re: [H] Network issue

2010-04-24 Thread maccrawj
I'd say that's likely part of it! On 4/24/2010 3:36 AM, Gaffer wrote: On Friday 23 April 2010 23:33:50 Winterlight wrote: OK, now I have replaced that router = Linksys WG54 with another Linksys WG54 that I updated the firmware on and checked it out as working well. Then I set it up for my Netwo

Re: [H] Network issue

2010-04-24 Thread Bino Gopal
My problem with that is AFAIK, he has other devices on the LAN that are working fine (getting NAT'ed to the outside, though I may be wrong about that), whereas it's just the TV devices that don't work-the difference with them is that they're "new" which makes me think it's something else, but i

Re: [H] Network issue

2010-04-24 Thread Winterlight
At this point (w/o doing the actual troubleshooting session) I'd say that you just collapse your networks into one flat 192.168.1.x (you don't need multiple networks anyway-not like you're firewalling and enforcing security policies b/w them anyway, are you?) I do need them, because I have e

[H] (no subject)

2010-04-24 Thread al
http://gedebeq.tripod.com/

Re: [H] (no subject)

2010-04-24 Thread maccrawj
Spam? Virus? Seems like an odd post! On 4/24/2010 7:05 PM, al wrote: http://gedebeq.tripod.com/

Re: [H] Network issue

2010-04-24 Thread maccrawj
So are you firewalling the WAP or just using a separate IP range? Worse comes to worse, assuming you are double NAT'd with the WAP doing DHCP for it's subnet. I'd setup the WAP as Gateway, DNS & DHCP server and it's DNS client pointing to gateway router. This should properly forward DNS request