I was looking forward to it until I made one of the best decisions I have
all year--I told TWC to go f themselves and went to Dish.
> -Original Message-
> From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
> boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
> Sent: Tuesda
Cable card tuner for mediacenter.
--Original Message--
From: Thane Sherrington
Sender: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
ReplyTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Ceton
Sent: Aug 10, 2010 2:15 PM
At 02:19 PM 10/08/2010, tmse...@rlrnews.com wrot
At 02:19 PM 10/08/2010, tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote:
How many on the list are waiting for a ceton mcard? Just wondering. :)
What is it?
T
At 03:36 PM 10/08/2010, Joshua MacCraw wrote:
Like ION HTPC's being made, it kicks ass video wise. Thanks to CUDA
certain apps can offload work to the GPU. Doesn't replace my Q6600
desktop by but gives me what I need portable short of serious games.
Video is all that matters because even decade
Was waiting on the initial reviews of the final hardware allowing
prices of 2tb drives to drop so it could keep up with the 4 streams
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:19 PM, tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote:
How many on the list are waiting for a ceton mcard? Just
wondering. :)
Sent v
I assume you talking one of these? Nice unit, GMA graphics = No Sale.
http://www.laptopspec.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ASUS-UL20AT-Specs.jpg
On 8/10/2010 10:49 AM, Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 02:35 PM 10/08/2010, Joshua MacCraw wrote:
Near as I can tell from reading reviews it's more like
Like ION HTPC's being made, it kicks ass video wise. Thanks to CUDA
certain apps can offload work to the GPU. Doesn't replace my Q6600
desktop by but gives me what I need portable short of serious games.
Video is all that matters because even decade old slow PC's are enough
CPU power short of e
At 02:35 PM 10/08/2010, Joshua MacCraw wrote:
Near as I can tell from reading reviews it's more like spend $800ish
vs $490 to get better CPU & maintain the same level of graphics as
the ION in the Asus 1201N. Caveat of the Atom platform is the
artificial 2GB RAM limit and not so hot CPU (N330 v
Near as I can tell from reading reviews it's more like spend $800ish vs
$490 to get better CPU & maintain the same level of graphics as the ION
in the Asus 1201N. Caveat of the Atom platform is the artificial 2GB RAM
limit and not so hot CPU (N330 vs. C2D) despite being 64bit dual core.
Otherwi
How many on the list are waiting for a ceton mcard? Just wondering. :)
Sent via BlackBerry
Actually I'm in somewhat of a quandary. My game box with Win7 X64 is
currently running on 2 gigs because I wanted my main box with the Phenom
II X6 1055T with Vista X64 to have a full 4 gigs. DDR2 is done and I don't
want to be buying anymore of it but I'm not yet in a position to upgrade
m
That's good news and I just based in on the fact that WinXP doesn't need
any more than 2 gigs to run optimally while I would not consider running
Win 7 X64 with any less than 4 gigs. My opinion of course and I have never
owned a portable of any kind and probably never will. There's just nothi
At 01:01 PM 10/08/2010, Joshua MacCraw wrote:
You base that on fact or just impression? I've not found W7 any
slower than XP on the same hardware.
In my testing, I haven't found W7 to be significantly slower than XP
on 2GB or more. Haven't tried with less. Not a fan of
netbooks. Too slow.
I concur, XP is more light-weight IMO.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 09:01:55AM -0700, Joshua MacCraw wrote:
> You base that on fact or just impression? I've not found W7 any slower
> than XP on the same hardware.
>
> On 8/8/2010 8:08 PM, Scoobydo wrote:
> > XP is faster especially with only 2 gigs o
You base that on fact or just impression? I've not found W7 any slower
than XP on the same hardware.
On 8/8/2010 8:08 PM, Scoobydo wrote:
XP is faster especially with only 2 gigs of RAM..
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:30:08 -0500, Steve Tomporowski
wrote:
I went out and got a netbook, it's an Asu
You wasted good money then, should have gotten the Asus EEE PC 1201N!
Same degree of bloatware to remove & I had to upgrade to W7 business
from the high end W7 home version but well worth the money IMHO over
anything else I looked at.
On 8/8/2010 5:30 PM, Steve Tomporowski wrote:
I went out
Testing...
Seems Thunderbird has taken to posting/responding here using my other
account when I hit reply? Was wondering why it seemed like I was not
involved in the conversation!
Now to figure out why the "Delivered-To:" is not the account I reply from...
Great way to watch movies by having them given to you in barter for your
assistance. Had any ladies give you any pron yet? Not a bad business
model. LOL
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:54:11 -0500, Steve Tomporowski
wrote:
I'm about to get around to posting on their forum. On one computer that
Depends on the point of the raid controller. I'm not saying its as
good as a real controller but if he only needs as much performance as
his old setup and wants the extra reliability then onboard mirrored
raid is good enough and sould be faster then what he has now.
Just because you can spend a m
Keyword there is "most". I've actually had pretty good results with Intel's
onboard Matrix RAID functionality, so long as you know its limitations,
namely:
1. No ability to set up e-mail alerts when a drive has failed
2. No ability to set reconstruction/rebuild priorities--it's always 100%,
which
I have both the lifetime AnyDVDHD and CloneDVD. The reason I like
AnyDVD HD is because it breaks the copy protection so you can play on
any system regardless of whether it meets the HDCP stuff. Of course, it
enables ripping too, but even though I have nearly 1000 discs I don't
bother doing tha
I'm about to get around to posting on their forum. On one computer that
will be difficult, because as soon as I turn on logging, it can read the
disk! So guess what the log will tell them. LOL. I have to do due
diligence and search the forum for people with similar problems. And,
no, I'm n
22 matches
Mail list logo
