Would also simply make the connection speed paid for never used because the router can't handle it, thus a waste of money paying for more than 100Mbs service. You'll never get more than 100 that no matter how many sites you open with a limited router, seems pointless.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 6:10 PM Bino Gopal <binogo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Would only affect you for large file downloads that could go over 100 > Mbps... > > Also if you had a hub you'd have a problem, but a switch is fine. Any > recent router should have a gig port tho so you wouldn't be limited... > > BINO > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hardware <hardware-boun...@lists.hardwaregroup.com> On Behalf Of _ > Winterlight > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 2:29 PM > To: hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com > Subject: Re: [H] 10/100 or 1000 > > That is what I thought and normally that wouldn't be a problem but > Sparklite formally Cable One gives me 200+ down and 20 up. Not that I am > aware of any web page that would serve out that kind of speed. > ________________________________ > From: Hardware <hardware-boun...@lists.hardwaregroup.com> on behalf of > Julian Zottl <jzo...@radiantnetworks.net> > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 1:27 PM > To: hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com <hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com> > Subject: Re: [H] 10/100 or 1000 > > On the LAN you’ll be a 1Gbps between all machines. Any connections to the > internet will be at 100Mbps. > > Sent from my iThingy, but not in that iShortBus kind of way. > > > On Nov 18, 2020, at 3:58 PM, _ Winterlight <winterli...@outlook.com> > wrote: > > > > If I use a router that has 4 10/100 ports and is only connected to a > cable modem plus a 10/100/1000 switch that feeds everything else on the > LAN...will the LAN members be able to transfer files between themselves at > gigabit speeds or will everything be choked by the router? > > <w> >
