With false positives, how could you tell???
j/kSteve
On 7/20/05, Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:35 PM 19/07/2005, Ben Ruset wrote:
> >Ugh. I've switched all of our corporate PC's to ClamWin anti-virus. Seems
> >to do a good job, auto-updates, and best of all - is free.
>
At 09:35 PM 19/07/2005, Ben Ruset wrote:
Ugh. I've switched all of our corporate PC's to ClamWin anti-virus. Seems
to do a good job, auto-updates, and best of all - is free.
ClamWin does look interesting, though I'd be a bit leery of trusting my
system to a pre 1.0 release.
Have you scanned an
y, July 19, 2005 7:36 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Ugh. I've switched all of our corporate PC's to ClamWin anti-virus.
Seems to do a good job, auto-updates, and best of all - is free.
I have never liked Symantec/Norton AV. Best commercial product I
On the corporate level, I really like TrendMicro's OfficeScan series.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Ruset
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 7:36 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Ugh. I've switc
tral management is a pain.
Hayes Elkins wrote:
Yes.
From: "TX-GM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List
To: "The Hardware List"
Subject: Re: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:13:47 -0500
Does the problem exist with most recent ver
Yes.
From: "TX-GM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List
To: "The Hardware List"
Subject: Re: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:13:47 -0500
Does the problem exist with most recent version 10.0.1.1000?
- Original Message - Fro
Does the problem exist with most recent version 10.0.1.1000?
- Original Message -
From: "Hayes Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Oh and the real joy is that this needs to be executed by
e List
Subject: RE: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:05:00 -0700
do you have any links about this ? recently put 10 in ( from 9 ) but really
hadn't notice any problems. ( or improvements over 9 either )
if a major bug I could go back to 9
fp
At 07:27 AM 7/19/2005, Hayes E
EACH user of the client pc.
From: "Hayes Elkins"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:04:16 -0400
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[-HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Intel\
The registry can be manipulated remotely
- Original Message -
Oh and the real joy is that this needs to be executed by EACH user of the
client pc.
From: "Hayes Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H]
Oh and the real joy is that this needs to be executed by EACH user of the
client pc.
From: "Hayes Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:04:16 -0400
Windows
t;=dword:0001
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Intel\LANDesk\VirusProtect6\CurrentVersion\Custom
Tasks\TaskPadStartup]
From: FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List
To: The Hardware List
Subject: RE: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:15:39 -0700
how abo
ply-To: The Hardware List
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:26:34 -0700
Not sure why but all of a sudden my NAV is taking 6 hours plus to scan.
Set to scan every night at midnight and it is still running when I get up
at 6AM.
not sure WTF
any
Piece of Shit.
Winterlight wrote:
At 09:24 AM 7/18/2005, you wrote:
The new version, SAVCE v10, is a POS.
POS = Point of Sale? But that isn't what you mean
--
Cheers,
joeuser (still looking for the 'any' key)
At 09:24 AM 7/18/2005, you wrote:
The new version, SAVCE v10, is a POS.
POS = Point of Sale? But that isn't what you mean
The new version, SAVCE v10, is a POS.
One revision deep and STILL no built in fix for the startscan memory leak.
Manual registry hack is the only way to fix.
From: FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] norton corporate AV
Turn off Heuristic scans.
Estimate new scan time.
Decide between the two.
007
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of FORC5
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 9:27 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] norton corporate AV ?
Not sure why but
Not sure why but all of a sudden my NAV is taking 6 hours plus to scan. Set to
scan every night at midnight and it is still running when I get up at 6AM.
not sure WTF
any clues appreciated
fp
--
Tallyho ! ]:8)
--
Don't judge a book by its mini-series.
18 matches
Mail list logo
