Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

http://graphics.tomshardware.com/video/20050617/index.html Tom's Hardware does a pretty good review of Divx 6 and comparison to the other codecs. Looks like the software they were given has all the little tweaks and options we we looking for in Divx Converter. Also they were able to successfully

RE: [H] DiVX 6 Released

At 04:44 AM 6/20/2005, Neil Davidson typed: If you want other tools to process TS MPEG-2 files, have a look for ProjectX. I think it is maybe on sourceforge, but I got it on http://www.doom9.org/ along with a bunch of other good tools and guides :) I've been using HDTVtoMPEG2 1.1 but it still l

RE: [H] DiVX 6 Released

ECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Johnson > Sent: 20 June 2005 04:19 > To: Brian Weeden; The Hardware List > Subject: Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released > > At 09:42 PM 6/19/2005, Brian Weeden typed: > >Meanwhile, I still highly recommend AutoGK for now. Gordian > Knot has > >been the ri

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

At 09:42 PM 6/19/2005, Brian Weeden typed: Meanwhile, I still highly recommend AutoGK for now. Gordian Knot has been the rippack of choice for turning video files/dvds/whatever into MPEG-4 using Xvid or Divx. However, it always required several programs to be installed and configured and run in

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

BTW - anyone know where Divx 6 Creator outputs its files too? I stopped one in the middle of encoding but can't seem to find it. -- Brian

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

Biggest problem I have seen with Divx 6 so far is there are no options to configure. You give it the source files, tell it what audio/subtitle/video tracks to process, and it goes. Great for the average user, not really what I am looking for. But maybe it will be okay. I will encode some stuff

RE: [H] DiVX 6 Released

ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Reeves Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 6:38 PM To: 'The Hardware List' Subject: RE: [H] DiVX 6 Released Yep, I upgraded from Dr. DiVX. I figured, for $8, it was worth a try. I've been using mostly Nero Dig

RE: [H] DiVX 6 Released

s are very nice. Not many other thoughts.. yet. I'll try to convert some TV shows, etc. tonight and see how it goes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Davidson Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:50 PM To: 'The Hardware List' Subjec

RE: [H] DiVX 6 Released

y disks on the network, but can't justify doing it with .iso images :) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jeff.lane > Sent: 16 June 2005 20:14 > To: Brian Weeden; The Hardware List > Subject: Re: [H] DiVX 6 Release

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

Thanks for the explanation. Jeff - Original Message - From: "Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "hwg" Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 6:46 AM Subject: Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released Why would you have to do that, Brian? http://www.divx.com/divx/dmf.php Righ

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

Right now everything I have is in Xvid, which I love. But there are some nice things about Divx 6. It scales up to awesome quality (comparable to Apple's H.264 some say) and awesome compression (even smaller file sizes than Xvid). Just to be picky--Apple had nothing to do with the developmen

RE: [H] DiVX 6 Released

al Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:47 AM To: hwg Subject: Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released > Why would you have to do that, Brian? http://www.divx.com/divx/dmf.php Right now everything I have is in Xvid, which I lov

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

> Why would you have to do that, Brian? http://www.divx.com/divx/dmf.php Right now everything I have is in Xvid, which I love. But there are some nice things about Divx 6. It scales up to awesome quality (comparable to Apple's H.264 some say) and awesome compression (even smaller file sizes tha

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

At 09:19 PM 6/15/2005, Greg Sevart typed: I've switched to xvid for any video I need to encode. Higher quality, smaller files, MUCH sharper than that blurry Divx stuff...and completely free for all features. More active development. I did pretty much the same thing with my AMD 64 3800+ & am ve

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

I've switched to xvid for any video I need to encode. Higher quality, smaller files, MUCH sharper than that blurry Divx stuff...and completely free for all features. More active development. The downside? It is a touch slower to encode. On a 2.61GHz Athlon 64 (Venice) though, I don't much care

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

At 07:54 PM 6/15/2005, Brian Weeden typed: Looks pretty darn good. Only problem is I am going to have to redownload all my TV shows again :) That would be a good reason not to use it if that's the case. --+-- Wayne D. Johnson Ashland, OH, USA 44805

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

Why would you have to do that, Brian? Jeff - Original Message - From: "Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "The Hardware List" Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released Looks pretty darn good. Only problem is I am going to

Re: [H] DiVX 6 Released

Looks pretty darn good. Only problem is I am going to have to redownload all my TV shows again :) -- Brian