RE: [H] What's the best version of Norton Utils for Win2k?

Yes, I still use 2003 with no problems, at all, in both 2K and XP. I still like speed disk, and the scheduler although I typically install a different anti virus program... but there is no reason why you shouldn't use the one that comes with 2003. At 09:06 AM 8/16/2005, you wrote: Activation

RE: [H] What's the best version of Norton Utils for Win2k?

Activation started with NU 2004. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Johnson Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:03 AM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] What's the best version of Norton Utils for Win2k? At 11:34 AM 8/16/2005,

Re: [H] What's the best version of Norton Utils for Win2k?

At 11:34 AM 8/16/2005, W. D. typed: So would Systemworks 2001 be OK? I would think so. Wasn't that before they started the activation scheme as well? Feel free to wait & see what the others think tho. --+-- Wayne D. Johnson Ashland, OH, USA 44805

Re: [H] What's the best version of Norton Utils for Win2k?

At 10:11 8/16/2005, Wayne Johnson wrote: >At 10:57 AM 8/16/2005, W. D. typed: >>Also, what other utilities will keep Windows 2000 (Svc Pak 4) >>in shape? > >I use Norton Utils 2001 on my Win2k machine without any problems. So would Systemworks 2001 be OK? Start Here to Find It Fast!™ -> http://ww

Re: [H] What's the best version of Norton Utils for Win2k?

At 10:57 AM 8/16/2005, W. D. typed: Also, what other utilities will keep Windows 2000 (Svc Pak 4) in shape? I use Norton Utils 2001 on my Win2k machine without any problems. --+-- Wayne D. Johnson Ashland, OH, USA 44805