> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 12:37:25 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham
>
> > > > Does HarfBuzz guess the language?
> > >
> > > Yes.
>
> It seems to use the current locale. That will usually be wrong for
> cuneiform, and generally be wrong for multilingual text.
But Emacs currently doesn't know b
> From: Nikolay Sivov
> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:03:01 +0300
> Cc: Richard Wordingham ,
> Harfbuzz
>
> > Essentially yes, i.e. unsupported features will simply be ignored.
>
> Then there's no need to know whether a feature is supported. Thanks.
>
> MS Word for example shows a previe
Hey there,
> The next question is how to know whether a given hb_font_t supports a
given feature?
Apparently you won't need this anymore. If you do however, you can use
`hb_ot_layout_language_find_feature`, it has the mentioned the
complications, after that you can even issue
`hb_ot_layout_featur
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 10:03:01 +0300
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:33 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Then there's no need to know whether a feature is supported.
> > Thanks.
> MS Word for example shows a preview for each support ssXX feature,
> and user can select one they want.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:33 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:33:00 +0100
> > From: Richard Wordingham
> > Cc: harfbuzz@lists.freedesktop.org
> >
> > On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:15:04 +0300
> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > > > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:13:25 +0100
> > > > From:
> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:33:00 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham
> Cc: harfbuzz@lists.freedesktop.org
>
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:15:04 +0300
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:13:25 +0100
> > > From: Richard Wordingham
> > >
> > > I think it's safe to specify the use o
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 21:15:04 +0300
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:13:25 +0100
> > From: Richard Wordingham
> >
> > I think it's safe to specify the use of unsupported features, in
> > which case this is a luxury feature.
>
> you mean, specifying an unsupported feature wil
> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:13:25 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham
>
> I think it's safe to specify the use of unsupported features, in which
> case this is a luxury feature.
you mean, specifying an unsupported feature will not cause hb_shape to
fail, but instead just use the nominal glyphs?
>
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:59:56 +0300
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> The next question is how to know whether a given hb_font_t supports a
> given feature?
I think it's safe to specify the use of unsupported features, in which
case this is a luxury feature. One complication is that features are
provided b
> From: Nikolay Sivov
> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 17:00:53 +0300
> Cc: Harfbuzz
>
> AFAIU, HarfBuzz does support Stylistic Sets, but it is not clear to me
> what should an application do to request glyphs corresponding to a
> certain stylistic set.
>
> Suppose an application wants to display a
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:54 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIU, HarfBuzz does support Stylistic Sets, but it is not clear to me
> what should an application do to request glyphs corresponding to a
> certain stylistic set.
>
> Suppose an application wants to display a text string using a spe
11 matches
Mail list logo