On 1/27/06, Anton Avtamonov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for being away during the major part of your discussion. Hope
I'm still not too late.
As I can see currently we have only one 'exotic' situation - some
tests which are based on providers and use so many provider's
fucntionality that
On 1/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
On 1/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the test can be configured by a few people only who works on that
specific area and those people are aware of those tests why not just
print a log when
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-53?page=all ]
Tim Ellison reassigned HARMONY-53:
--
Assign To: Tim Ellison
java.io.File.hashCode() returns incorrect value
---
Key: HARMONY-53
Hi Mikhail,
Comments inlined below.
Best regards,
George
IBM UK
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi Anton,
On 1/28/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/06, Anton Avtamonov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for being away during the major part of your discussion. Hope
I'm still
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-20?page=comments#action_12364331 ]
George Harley commented on HARMONY-20:
--
Yep, fixed.
Thanks Tim.
java.util.Collections rotate() gives incorrect result with distance parameter
of min possible
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-20?page=all ]
Tim Ellison closed HARMONY-20:
--
Validated by George
java.util.Collections rotate() gives incorrect result with distance parameter
of min possible integer value
P.S. There are also 'integration' tests that verify how different 'units'
work together.
I think the areas of various tests intersect and it would be good to define
them on this early stage
Thanks,
Mikhail
On 1/29/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi George,
another example: