Re: [classlib] Recognizing lock objects

Tim Ellison wrote: Endre Stølsvik wrote: What about an marker interface, or common ancestor class? Just to mark it as being of this type of usage? Would do a lot of good, I recon, to be able to trace/track such usages..? (Re java.util.EventListener, "A tagging interface.. ")

Re: [classlib] Recognizing lock objects

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: | | | Tim Ellison wrote: | > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: | >> +1 | >> | >> BTW, why call it "RepositionLock"? | > | > That was just an example taken from the class I was looking at, I've | > called them different names depending upon the inst var name

Re: So today Sun announced...

| | I'm not sure how to answer this. I believe you are a little confused about | how the JCP works and what we're doing here, and people are asking for. | | First, we aren't advocating changes in the way Java SE specification is | defined. So you still want the JCP? Run by Sun? Or by who? |

Re: So today Sun announced...

On Fri, 19 May 2006, Chris Gray wrote: | | > Open Source java wouldn't be the same if there wasn't some standard to | > follow and adhere to. If this "standard" is defined rather more by one | > company than the rest - what is the real problem? | | The real problem is that if that company also m

Re: So today Sun announced...

On Tue, 16 May 2006, Fernando Cassia wrote: | I give Sun credit for two things... | | 1. preventing polluting of the platform a la J++. | | "In a June 20, 1996, memo entitled "windows & internet issues" Microsoft's | then-VP Paul Maritz | explained