, i.e., not part of the 100MB heap above.
Thus, this comparisons really aren't apples-to-apples.
Mike
-
Michael Hind, Manager, Dynamic Optimization Group
IBM Watson Research Center
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hind
Steve Liao wrote:
I was just wondering if a unified format (more than a unified interface)
makes sense for Harmony. One advantage is to allow GC to enumerate
without relying on JIT. Any other benefit?
Of course, both ways could work.
At a high level, the stack maps are a data structure
Steve Liao wrote:
I would like to find out how other Harmony developers want to solve
some basic JIT/VM interfacing. One area is stack maps for precise
enumeration of live object references.
Does anyone know how other open source JVMs do the above?
Jikes RVM's compilers (baseline
Stefano wrote:
Mike,
how do the above strategies compare to RISC-ification of CPU bytecode
that happens in modern superscalar CPUs?
do you think there is something to learn there? or has been already?
--
Stefano, honestly curious.
Hi Stefano,
I don't see the connection,
Steven Gong wrote:
Is the sampling process done before running or during runtime?
Sampling, like counter incrementing, is done at runtime. They are both
runtime profiling techniques to try to ascertain what methods are
important. The profile (whether method counts or samples) is used
