Mikhail,
Sorry to response so late, seems both IBM's smtp server and gmail is not
stable so that I have to send this mail several times from today before
yesterday (please pardon me if the mailing list get several duplicate mails
after hundreds of hours! ).
Basically, I'm afraid I cannot agree
Hi, Mikhail,
2006/5/25, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Paulex,
2006/5/25, Yang Paulex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail,
Sorry to response so late, seems both IBM's smtp server and gmail is not
stable so that I have to send this mail several times from today before
yesterday (please
2006/5/25, Yang Paulex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, Mikhail,
2006/5/25, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Paulex,
2006/5/25, Yang Paulex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail,
Sorry to response so late, seems both IBM's smtp server and gmail is
not
stable so that I have to send this mail
+1 from me
I also suggest we use Jetty as a singleton, so that we don't need to pay
the overhead to find an available port and to start http server.
The proposal is:
1. Some utility class in support project is responsible to lazily start
Jetty when necessary on an available port in embedded
Hi, All
This voting has been open for about one week, so I guess maybe it's time to
summary the results or so? Seems the result is exciting! and I'm going to be
ready to living with staffs like EnumE extends EnumE;-)
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Labotary
IBM
Agree with you that the relation with java.net package is also one of our
main concern about SocketChannel, etc. And basically we took similiar
approach to implement it.
I've put the details into JIRA. Pls. refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-27
Some implementation difference
