active discussion in Suns OpenSource-Java forum

Hi Harmonys! I want only to mention, that at http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=18036start=0tstart=0 is an active discussion about what GNU Classpath developer think, how Suns Java license must look like and what people think, if it is better to have only one implementation (if

Bringing License arguments to Sun

At http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=17634tstart=0 Sun's Chief Open Source Officer Simon Phipps alias webmink http://forums.java.net/jive/profile.jspa?userID=70 wrotes, that he have still not decided, which OpenSource license will be used for Suns Java. He wrote: To be clear,

OT: JFontChooser

Hi! Have a look at http://common.l2fprod.com/ https://l2fprod.dev.java.net/ https://l2fprod-common.dev.java.net/ there existing a JFontChooser https://l2fprod-common.dev.java.net/images/FontChooser.jpg under the Apache License. :-) And at http://jfontchooser.sourceforge.net/ is one under the

With the OpenSource-movements Sun changed the synonyms

Read at http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ray_gans/archive/2006/08/mustang_and_dol.html Mustang and Dolphin will no longer exists as synonyms. The reason is the move of Java to OpenSource. Greatings theuserbl - Terms of use :

Swing don't run on Windows

Hi! AT first, congratulations to Apache and Intel for the new snapshots at http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/harmony/snapshots/ from the 4. Augusta 2006. Now it has in the hdk-version its own JVM integrated, so that IBMs JVM is no longer needed. But on Windows there isn't neither in

Releationship to GNU Classpath?

Hi! Can anybody at Harmony say, whats the releationship (or non-releationship) to GNU Classpath is? At the beginning of Apache Harmony it sounds, that Harmony would use GNU Classpath for its class libraries. But since Intel have spend Harmony its own Swing implementation, it is clear,

Sun Says GPL Is a Possibility for OSS Java

JavaONE 2006 is over. Sun have not opend Java, as many people have hoped. But Sun hold on the speculations, if Suns Java will be OpenSource or not. At OSNews.com at http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=14770 stand, that a GPL Java could be possible. The links ends up at Jonathan Schwatzs

Layout of FAQ

Hi! The FAQ-Side http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/faq.html have no layout! It is only a simple text-file which is inlcuded in a HTML-file. So I have created faq3.html and faq4.html, which you can find in the attachment of this mail. faq3.html is the poor faq-side with a new layout. And

RE: Layout of FAQ

So I have created faq3.html and faq4.html, which you can find in the attachment of this mail. Hmmm... it seems, that there existing problems with the attachment. Ok, then have a look at http://user.web-gear.com/theuserbl/faq3.html http://user.web-gear.com/theuserbl/faq4.html to see the new

Re: Layout of FAQ

That's great! But can you offer it to us in XML format? All are docs are XML based. See http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/harmony/standard/site/ which is how we maintain and render the site... Hmmm.. I have not so much experience with XML. But I have tried to integrate it there.

Re: Gosling on Harmony

At first I want to cite myself: Sun have given with OpenOffice.org the OpenSource-community a lot. But with Java, it looks a little bit diffrent. And the reason is, that Java _is_ already popular. So they see no need to make it more popular. [...] The idea behind it is clear: Letting a platform

Re: Harmony may provide a more general VM than JVM

Harmony is focus on provide a Tiger compatible JVM, but i think it is possible to make it more general for other language such as .NET, Haskell, Smalltalk etc. I think in this point it would be better, to go the way like Haiku (the BeOS-rewrite): The first and importants goal is, to be 100%