Weldon,
Thank you, for your interest. The main idea of the implementation is
just education of myself. I wanted to start with train algorithm to
better understand its pros and cons. I didn't supposed to stick with
that algorithm. Moreover, when just starting the implementation I
noticed some
Hi Ivan,
On 6/13/06, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, I have found small performance improvement to GCv4 which can be
easily added to it.
Could you please post more details about this possible perf enhancement
to V4?
...
Well, I'm going to do this development just for
Ivan,
Even if the vtable gc data layout change is small and code specific, it
will be interesting to see the change proposal here first, specially if you
are considering submitting it.
Sounds quite promising. 1.5% is not small. Some details of which workload
saw the 1.5% collection delta would
Ivan,
Please note that two guys who worked for me on ORP
(http://orp.sourceforge.net/ ) spent 2-3 years building and tuning the
train algorithm. We could never get the performance to acceptable
level. Ultimately we ditched the train algorithm and built GCV4 in
less than 3 months. GCV4 was
While some works going on to properly integrate DRLVM in harmony build system...
I would like to start development of new garbage collector. I know
about Weldon's work related to MMTk. I am not sure that it is the
right way.
Instead of doing GC based on java, I would concentrate on the one
