Re: [Fwd: Re: [classlib] Tests for serialization – which package, name?]

2006-04-28 Thread Mikhail Loenko
I suggest that we first decide how we will test serialization, otherwise we may make a low-level decision that will make some high-level designs impossible Thanks, Mikhail 2006/4/28, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > On 4/28/06, Paulex Yang wrote: > > > >> Paulex Yang

Re: [Fwd: Re: [classlib] Tests for serialization – which package, name?]

2006-04-28 Thread Stepan Mishura
On 4/28/06, Paulex Yang wrote: > > Paulex Yang wrote: > > > I think two serialization test is necessary in general: > > > > 1. test for Harmony itself, which ensure that the object can be > > serialized/deserialized smoothly within Harmony VM/classlib > > 2. test for compatibility with RI, which e

Re: [Fwd: Re: [classlib] Tests for serialization – which package, name?]

2006-04-27 Thread Mikhail Loenko
2006/4/28, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Anton Avtamonov wrote: > > > On 4/27/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> As far as most of serialization tests extend SerializationTest then > >> having serialization test cases included into a regular unit tests > >> would cause that