[Fwd: svn commit: r376144 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/security2/make/build.xml]

2006-02-09 Thread Tim Ellison
Arghhh! make it stop From below: -Xbootclasspath/a:${build.path}/tests${path.separator}${env.CLASSPATH} putting the CLASSPATH onto the bootclasspath. What are you smokin' ?! [ I know you are fixing this stuff, but I needed to vent ] Original Message Subject: svn commit:

Re: [Fwd: svn commit: r376144 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/security2/make/build.xml]

2006-02-09 Thread George Harley
Hi, Is it really the case that the BC provider jar needs to be on the boot classpath ? There was some discussion on this a little over a week ago on this thread about the contribution of the beans, math and regex libraries. The post I want to refer to does not seem to be in the mailing list

Re: [Fwd: svn commit: r376144 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/security2/make/build.xml]

2006-02-09 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
George Harley wrote: Hi, Is it really the case that the BC provider jar needs to be on the boot classpath ? Probably not. There was some discussion on this a little over a week ago on this thread about the contribution of the beans, math and regex libraries. The post I want to refer to

Re: [Fwd: svn commit: r376144 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/security2/make/build.xml]

2006-02-09 Thread George Harley
Hi Geir, Excellent ! Best regards, George IBM UK Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: George Harley wrote: Hi, Is it really the case that the BC provider jar needs to be on the boot classpath ? Probably not. There was some discussion on this a little over a week ago on this thread about the

FYI missing mail (was: Re: [Fwd: svn commit: r376144 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/security2/make/build.xml])

2006-02-09 Thread Tim Ellison
George Harley wrote: snip The post I want to refer to does not seem to be in the mailing list archive (!!??!) I don't remember you saying that (and I would have remembered such an eloquent and considered post ;-) ) I still have mail that far back in my reader, and it looks like I didn't get it