Hi, all:
I will raise a jira to remove the generated documents from svn.
On 9/30/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 5:15 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Do you think we can have
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'm still pro stuffing the generated content into the svn fo the
website, and then pushing that out, because in the next snapshot, I
want to start getting into the habit of including the
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 5:15 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Do you think we can have the docs built on a regular basis (like, a
script that triggers Doxygen build say 2 times a week + on demand to
push updates if needed) and resulting docs stored on the website?
This way,
On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 5:15 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Do you think we can have the docs built on a regular basis (like, a
script that triggers Doxygen build say 2 times a week + on demand to
push updates if needed)
Hi, all:
I have fixed the script to generate vm_doc but there is a problem: the
newly generated vm_doc will override the original one which is under control
of svn. Thus it will lead to build failure since vm_doc lacks from the
perspective of svn. Since the content under the directories
of
Leo Li wrote:
Hi, all:
I have fixed the script to generate vm_doc but there is a problem:
the
newly generated vm_doc will override the original one which is under
control
of svn. Thus it will lead to build failure since vm_doc lacks from the
perspective of svn.
LOL, is it a problem of
This has been a problem for some time - I recall commenting out the call
to an ant target that cleaned that svn-checked out documentation.
If we are going to remove them, then I think we need to add them to the
website and ensure we update them regularly. (So that they exist in a
form we can
for all.
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:08 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][doc]Recommend to remove trunk\doc\kernel_doc and
trunk\doc\vm_doc from svn
Yep, the current situation is an artifact from way back -- I agree the
doc should be generated into the website are now.
Regards,
Tim
Mark Hindess wrote:
This has been a problem for some time - I recall commenting out the call
to an ant target that cleaned that svn-checked out documentation.
: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:08 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][doc]Recommend to remove trunk\doc\kernel_doc and
trunk\doc\vm_doc from svn repository.
This has been a problem for some time - I recall commenting
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hindess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:08 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][doc]Recommend to remove trunk\doc
\kernel_doc and
trunk\doc\vm_doc from svn repository.
This has been a problem for some
11 matches
Mail list logo
