2006/9/25, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> ... as suggested by Nikolay, I did run the tests
>
> $ cd modules/logging
> $ ant test
>
> and it was endless stacktraces, both before and after I made the
> modification.
>
> How do I know if I broke anything? I'm going
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
... as suggested by Nikolay, I did run the tests
$ cd modules/logging
$ ant test
and it was endless stacktraces, both before and after I made the
modification.
How do I know if I broke anything? I'm going to go forward with the
patch as I don't see any harm, s
+1
On Sep 23, 2006, at 8:50 AM, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Can't we muffle it for good?
2006/9/23, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... as suggested by Nikolay, I did run the tests
>
>$ cd modules/logging
>$ ant test
>
> and it
Can't we muffle it for good?
2006/9/23, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... as suggested by Nikolay, I did run the tests
>
>$ cd modules/logging
>$ ant test
>
> and it was endless stacktraces, both before and after I made the
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... as suggested by Nikolay, I did run the tests
$ cd modules/logging
$ ant test
and it was endless stacktraces, both before and after I made the
modification.
How do I know if I broke anything? I'm going to go forward with the
p
... as suggested by Nikolay, I did run the tests
$ cd modules/logging
$ ant test
and it was endless stacktraces, both before and after I made the
modification.
How do I know if I broke anything? I'm going to go forward with the
patch as I don't see any harm, since Logger.global is sup
