gt; > popularly because the standard is long simce in place at this time.
> > Not that I am opposed to other ideas, but I think this one should
> > stay with us.
> >
> > Dan Lydick
> >
> >
> >> [Original Message]
> >> From: Gei
tay with us.
>
> Dan Lydick
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Date: 1/18/06 5:42:57 AM
>> Subject: [classlib] Java namespace in org.apache.harmony
>>
>> I changed thread name to keep thi
ssage]
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 1/18/06 5:42:57 AM
> Subject: [classlib] Java namespace in org.apache.harmony
>
> I changed thread name to keep this issue from getting buried in the
> security2 discussion (and get it out of there...) I al
don't care either way
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> I changed thread name to keep this issue from getting buried in the
> security2 discussion (and get it out of there...) I also added
> [classlib] in the subject to help people sort things out... I plan to
> use [classlib:security2] for more d
On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed thread name to keep this issue from getting buried in the
> security2 discussion (and get it out of there...) I also added
> [classlib] in the subject to help people sort things out... I plan to
> use [classlib:security2] for mo
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I changed thread name to keep this issue from getting buried in the
security2 discussion (and get it out of there...) I also added
[classlib] in the subject to help people sort things out... I plan to
use [classli
I changed thread name to keep this issue from getting buried in the
security2 discussion (and get it out of there...) I also added
[classlib] in the subject to help people sort things out... I plan to
use [classlib:security2] for more disucssion about my sec2 problems...
"org.apache.harmony"
