subject:"\[classlib\] Unit and performance testing \(was Re\: \[jira\] Commented\: \(HARMONY\-31\) Move peformance timing of unit tests into a decorator class.\)"

Re: [classlib] Unit and performance testing (was Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit tests into a decorator class.)

2006-01-20 Thread Mikhail Loenko

Formally, option #2 from my mail that was > > 2. Remove PerformnceTest. Introduce a simple Logger that does not print by > > default. does not mix any performance *infrastructure* with junit testing. I think that we do not have to find the final solution right now, we might see various ideas as

[classlib] Unit and performance testing (was Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit tests into a decorator class.)

2006-01-20 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr

[I got sick of the thread subject - it blended into every other JIRA thread... ] There is a 4th option - not mix performance infrastructure with unit testing. I'm all for getting "PerformanceTest" out of the class hierarchy, and not having unit tests yammer out to console if we can avoid it.