[drlvm] Java stack limits (was: Re: [drlvm][em64t] build fails)

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by sucking in all memory... yeah, like those rotten C programs. You are damned if you do and damned if you don't, since you'll

Re: [drlvm] Java stack limits (was: Re: [drlvm][em64t] build fails)

Can we get the value from the harmonyvm.properties file? Thanks, Mikhail 2006/11/17, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by

Re: [drlvm] Java stack limits

Mikhail Loenko wrote: Can we get the value from the harmonyvm.properties file? I think the question is what default value should you choose? I believe we all agree that it should be configurable, at launch time (e.g. -Xss -Xmso), and yes at install time maybe in the .properties file. Regards,

Re: [drlvm] Java stack limits

Tim Ellison wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I think that it's totally unreasonable to have no upper bound on stack size. A Java virtual machine should never be able to hose a machine by sucking in all memory... yeah, like those rotten C programs. You are damned if you do and damned if