Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Actually, what about some kind of SPI? Or now that JSR-199 in in public
draft form, anything useful in there?
How would that help? We would still have to name the JAR that contains
those providers wouldn't we?
What do you think about simply adding all jars in jdk/lib
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Actually, what about some kind of SPI? Or now that JSR-199 in in public
draft form, anything useful in there?
How would that help? We would still have to name the JAR that contains
those providers wouldn't we?
No - the tool would examine