Yes, JDWP agent uses most of JVMTI functions, and testing JDWP level
indirectly checks JVMTI implementation. JDWP unit tests included into
JDWP contribution do not provide exhaustive testing, but they often
catch problems with basic JVMTI support related to debug
functionality.
However, there is
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days unless protest or early completion.
geir
+1 (with apologies for taking so long to complete the review)
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote
Initially I considered putting JDWP agent to classlib as part of JPDA
module, so its build is adjusted to the classlib build structure. But
I agree that putting it to tools directory (or to jdktools as
discussed in separate thread) should be better solution. JDWP agent is
not an implementation of
Ivan Popov wrote:
--- I'd like to see JDWP unit tests included into regular tests runs,
they often reveal problems with JVMTI and JNI support when JVM
implementation is changed. I'm not sure that unit tests are provided
with other tools and included into tests run, and this can be a
separate
+1
2006/9/28, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days unless protest or early
+1
-Stepan.
On 9/28/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days unless protest or early
+1
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:38 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [vote] HARMONY-1410 : JDWP agent for DRLVM
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using
+1
-Mark.
On 28 September 2006 at 1:38, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual
+1 from me.
--
Ivan
Intel Middleware Products Division
On 28 September 2006 at 1:38, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't
+1
2006/9/28, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1 from me.
--
Ivan
Intel Middleware Products Division
On 28 September 2006 at 1:38, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days unless protest or early completion.
geir
+1
2006/9/28, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days
+1, but it seems to me that its build is not aligned with the classlib
build structure. Please, correct me if I am wrong. Have somebody tried
to build it already?
On 9/28/06, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
2006/9/28, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Yes, build script for JDWP agent should be aligned with the current
classlib build structure. It should be easy, because it is generally
oriented to the classlib structure and requires just a few changes. I
can provide patch for this.
I tried to build JDWP agent as a separate classlib component
+1 from me
On Thursday 28 September 2006 14:25 Oleg Khaschansky wrote:
+1, but it seems to me that its build is not aligned with the classlib
build structure. Please, correct me if I am wrong. Have somebody tried
to build it already?
I've built it successfully on Linux but I unpacked JIRA
Keeping the discussion out of the vote thread.
Both this and javah aren't going into classlib anyway. I was going
to suggest we put them into /tools, bring the javac and keytool over,
and I volunteer to do it. Then add that to the federated build, and
get into the jdk.
geir
On Sep 28,
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days unless protest or early completion.
+1
--
Stefano.
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days unless protest or early completion.
geir
+1 from me
On Sep 28, 2006, at 1:38 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
BCC and ACQs are in.
What say ye? Would it be nice to debug using eclipse debugger in
DRLVM?
[ ] + 1 accept this contribution into the project
[ ] -1 don't accept (please give reason)
Vote runs usual 3 days unless protest
20 matches
Mail list logo
