Re: Solution for 5.0 language features in Eclipse(Re: And enum types (Re: API with generics))

2006-03-17 Thread Ashish Ranjan
> > >>I'm looking forward to see this voting happeningif this compiler > >>option is added into build system, it will introduce big convenience to > >>current development and help to avoid mass repeating upgrade work to > >>comply with Java 5 later (there are much in already). +1 from me too.

Re: Solution for 5.0 language features in Eclipse(Re: And enum types (Re: API with generics))

2006-03-17 Thread Paulex Yang
ould be taken advantage of there at least. -Nathan -Original Message- From: karan malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:04 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: API with generics Hi, I might have missed out on it in earl

Re: Solution for 5.0 language features in Eclipse(Re: And enum types (Re: API with generics))

2006-03-16 Thread Karan Malhi
omeEnum("enum2", 1); > >>>>public static final SomeEnum enum3 = new SomeEnum("enum3", 2); > >>>> > >>>>protected SomeEnum(String name, int |ordinal|){ > >>>> super(name, ordinal). > >>>>}

Re: Solution for 5.0 language features in Eclipse(Re: And enum types (Re: API with generics))

2006-03-16 Thread Tim Ellison
;>>protected SomeEnum(String name, int |ordinal|){ >>>> super(name, ordinal). >>>>} >>>> } >>>> >>>> and of course, the abstract class Enum(declaration without generics of >>>> course) must exist at fi

Re: Solution for 5.0 language features in Eclipse(Re: And enum types (Re: API with generics))

2006-03-16 Thread Richard Liang
ype comment In Eclipse's Java editor you can add special meaning to comments of a certain format, so this could be taken advantage of there at least. -Nathan -Original Message- From: karan malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:04 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.or

Re: Solution for 5.0 language features in Eclipse(Re: And enum types (Re: API with generics))

2006-03-16 Thread Oliver Deakin
be taken advantage of there at least. -Nathan -Original Message- From: karan malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:04 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: API with generics Hi, I might have missed out on it in earlier dis

Solution for 5.0 language features in Eclipse(Re: And enum types (Re: API with generics))

2006-03-16 Thread Paulex Yang
In Eclipse's Java editor you can add special meaning to comments of a certain format, so this could be taken advantage of there at least. -Nathan -Original Message----- From: karan malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:04 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Sub

Re: And enum types (Re: API with generics)

2006-03-15 Thread Mikhail Loenko
; > > > In Eclipse's Java editor you can add special meaning to comments of a > > certain format, so this could be taken advantage of there at least. > > > > -Nathan > > > > -Original Message- > > From: karan malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

And enum types (Re: API with generics)

2006-03-14 Thread Paulex Yang
Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:04 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: API with generics Hi, I might have missed out on it in earlier discussions so please excuse me for my ignorance. What is the strategy of harmony with regards to Generics? To be more specif

Re: API with generics

2006-03-14 Thread Mikhail Loenko
; > In Eclipse's Java editor you can add special meaning to comments of a > certain format, so this could be taken advantage of there at least. > > -Nathan > > -Original Message- > From: karan malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:04

RE: API with generics

2006-03-14 Thread Nathan Beyer
rtain format, so this could be taken advantage of there at least. -Nathan -Original Message- From: karan malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:04 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: API with generics Hi, I might have missed out on it in earlier discus

API with generics

2006-03-14 Thread karan malhi
Hi, I might have missed out on it in earlier discussions so please excuse me for my ignorance. What is the strategy of harmony with regards to Generics? To be more specific, I am right now implementing the javax.accessibility.AccessibleStateSet class which has a protected variable with the fo