Re: Contributions...

2006-03-21 Thread Mikhail Loenko
Hi Sanket, You are welcome to pick up any area. Even if something is already developed you may propose a better implementation! To get an idea of what is done vs. what is missing in the classlib you might want to look at http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/status.html

Re: Contributions...

2006-03-21 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Sanket Sharma wrote: Hi there, I've been following the posts for some time now and would like to jump on to the bandwagon. However, I feel instead of choosing any random area to contribute to, it would be better to ask the community what area needs most contribution. Welcome. We need hel

Contributions...

2006-03-21 Thread Sanket Sharma
Hi there, I've been following the posts for some time now and would like to jump on to the bandwagon. However, I feel instead of choosing any random area to contribute to, it would be better to ask the community what area needs most contribution. I welcome any suggestions and guidelines and ho

Re: Contributions in process

2006-03-01 Thread George Harley
e: I noticed that there are a few major contributions that are marked "In Process" [1][2]. Is there anything I, or others, can do to assist getting these contributions over the hill and into the repository and builds. -Nathan [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-39 [2

Re: Contributions in process

2006-03-01 Thread Stepan Mishura
Y-57). You may wish to try it and share your experience with us, for example, is it easy for you to set up and run tests. Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division On 3/1/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I noticed that there are a few major contributio

Contributions in process

2006-02-28 Thread Nathan Beyer
I noticed that there are a few major contributions that are marked "In Process" [1][2]. Is there anything I, or others, can do to assist getting these contributions over the hill and into the repository and builds. -Nathan [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-39

RE: failed to use xml formatter on contributions combination

2005-11-29 Thread Mishura, Stepan M
> ah... same stack trace as Ant Bugzilla Report 36733: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36733 Thank you for pointing out to the bug report. I added all jars mentioned in the bug report comments to class path and this resolved the issue. It made possible to use JUnitReport task t

Re: failed to use xml formatter on contributions combination

2005-11-28 Thread Matt Benson
> What the NPE from? > > Also, we should start thinking about these external > dependencies that > we can take advantage of and start formalizing how > we bundle the pile > together... > > geir > > On Nov 28, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Mishura, Stepan M > wrote:

Re: failed to use xml formatter on contributions combination

2005-11-28 Thread Matt Benson
the pile > together... > > geir > > On Nov 28, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Mishura, Stepan M > wrote: > > > While running security unit test on contributions > combination > > (lang/util/io/net/nio plus security/crypto/x-net) > I tried to generate > > tests rep

Re: failed to use xml formatter on contributions combination

2005-11-28 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
What the NPE from? Also, we should start thinking about these external dependencies that we can take advantage of and start formalizing how we bundle the pile together... geir On Nov 28, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Mishura, Stepan M wrote: While running security unit test on contributions

failed to use xml formatter on contributions combination

2005-11-28 Thread Mishura, Stepan M
While running security unit test on contributions combination (lang/util/io/net/nio plus security/crypto/x-net) I tried to generate tests report with 'xml' formatter. So I added xml jars to class path and changed formatter type in build.xml to 'xml'. But all tests failed

[Fwd: Re: Call for Contributions (was Re: 4 Months and...)]

2005-11-23 Thread David Tanzer
Oops, didn't send it to the mailing list. Sorry. Forwarded Message > From: David Tanzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Rodrigo Kumpera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Call for Contributions (was Re: 4 Months and...) > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:51

Re: Call for Contributions (was Re: 4 Months and...)

2005-11-23 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
l > > > > commit rather than lazy veto/etc. > > > > > > Most projects give committership to people that have offered code and > > > patches, don't they? > > > > > > geir > > > > > > > > > > > -Andy >

Re: Call for Contributions (was Re: 4 Months and...)

2005-09-20 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
to restate that we are always looking for code contributions. I do know of some in preparation, but it should be clear that if you have anything to offer (hey, Dan!) please post a note to dev list to discuss. :) geir On Sep 19, 2005, at 5:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Four months and no code. O

Re: Call for Contributions (was Re: 4 Months and...)

2005-09-20 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
projects work if you will such that the barrier is to initial > > commit rather than lazy veto/etc. > > Most projects give committership to people that have offered code and > patches, don't they? > > geir > > > > > -Andy > > > > Geir Magnusson

Re: Call for Contributions (was Re: 4 Months and...)

2005-09-20 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Most projects give committership to people that have offered code and patches, don't they? geir -Andy Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I'd like to restate that we are always looking for code contributions. I do know of some in preparation, but it should be clear that if you have anythin

Re: Call for Contributions (was Re: 4 Months and...)

2005-09-20 Thread acoliver
are always looking for code contributions. I do know of some in preparation, but it should be clear that if you have anything to offer (hey, Dan!) please post a note to dev list to discuss. :) geir On Sep 19, 2005, at 5:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Four months and no code. O

Call for Contributions (was Re: 4 Months and...)

2005-09-19 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
I'd like to restate that we are always looking for code contributions. I do know of some in preparation, but it should be clear that if you have anything to offer (hey, Dan!) please post a note to dev list to discuss. :) geir On Sep 19, 2005, at 5:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-13 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: - native2ascii replacement. I'll have a go at this. -- Thorbjørn

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-10 Thread Aparna Kataria
Hi All, I have been working on Java Technology since past few years. I would like to contribute to the Harmony project. I would like to know how can I contribute and where can I get to see the architecture for the project. Thanks, Aparna On 8/8/05, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-08 Thread Ian Darwin
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I assume that the entire work was written by you, and no improvements from Kaffe have been incorporated? geir That is correct. Ian

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: So far, we don't have the requirement of a CorpCLA. I think our biggest concerns are the areas of previous exposure to Java technology. He he :) Well, I must say that I've been exposed to the Java technology for years. My wife would say, even too much, probably.

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Aug 8, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Aug 8, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Since one of the requirements is the 'jar replacement' I wish to volunteer for that. Excellent. I'll have an update to the Authorized Contributor Questionnaire later

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Aug 8, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Since one of the requirements is the 'jar replacement' I wish to volunteer for that. Excellent. I'll have an update to the Authorized Contributor Questionnaire later today, but take a look at that and see if you have

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Aug 8, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Aug 6, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Ian Darwin wrote: Well, this is tiny and trivial but I guess its a start. A river starts with a single raindrop Since one of the requirements is the 'jar replacement' I wish to volunt

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Aug 6, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Ian Darwin wrote: Well, this is tiny and trivial but I guess its a start. A river starts with a single raindrop Since one of the requirements is the 'jar replacement' I wish to volunteer for that. I already have 'almost workable' solut

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Aug 6, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Ian Darwin wrote: Well, this is tiny and trivial but I guess its a start. A river starts with a single raindrop - javap replacement. Attached. This is a partial JavaP replacement that I wrote, using the Reflection API. It doesn't implement the options e

Re: Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-06 Thread Ian Darwin
Well, this is tiny and trivial but I guess its a start. - javap replacement. Attached. This is a partial JavaP replacement that I wrote, using the Reflection API. It doesn't implement the options e.g., for dumping bytecode, but it does the most commonly-used part. Note an earlier version o

Moving forward - call for contributions

2005-08-01 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
uld be as conservative as possible, but lets get going. The following are how I think things break down, I'd like to renew a call for contributions in the following areas (and any not mentioned) : VM and Parts I think (and others think) we have at least a two-phased approach

Re: [license] Contributions from tainted developers?

2005-05-19 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On May 19, 2005, at 5:25 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: Hi, What can someone that agreed to the SCSL contribute? I've agreed on the SCSL for the 1.4.2 JVM and I want to contribute to Harmony. I did a carefull reading of the license and in my layman's undestanding, I cannot contribute to anything t

[license] Contributions from tainted developers?

2005-05-19 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
Hi, What can someone that agreed to the SCSL contribute? I've agreed on the SCSL for the 1.4.2 JVM and I want to contribute to Harmony. I did a carefull reading of the license and in my layman's undestanding, I cannot contribute to anything that is convered by the 1.4.2 spec since it would