On 6/14/06, Robin Garner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The port to rotor was done by Andrew Gray at ANU, and was based on my
work integrating MMTk into C-based runtimes. The approach used was to
apply a source code transformation to turn the MMTk 'magic' into native
methods (using CNI) on primitive
Weldon Washburn wrote:
oops, I forgot to cc:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 24, 2006 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/24/06, Daniel Feinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is
oops. I forgot to cc:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 24, 2006 6:43 AM
Subject: Re: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel,
I really appreciate your offer to help. On the surface, our
backgrounds are
oops, I forgot to cc:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 24, 2006 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/24/06, Daniel Feinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is cool, so the other thing i
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Feinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 24, 2006 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm
To: Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something like a reference counter does not really need a write
barrier. They are mostly used when
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Feinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 24, 2006 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: [DRLVM] proposal to port MMTK to drlvm
To: Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is good. The JikesRVM and MMTK code is also built like this with
an interface between the two.
