On Jun 15, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jun 15, 2005, at 7:58 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
well, "you" because "we" have nobody in the EG yet ;-)
I'm on the EG.
Um, check that. Was pre-coffee, and I thought you meant something else.
I've applied to have the ASF as
On 6/15/05, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been wanting this since 1998 when we started the Avalon project...
> if I knew I should have waited 10 years, probably I would have written
> my own language ;-)
Some of it actually materialized in Avalon before its meltdown. That
w
On Jun 15, 2005, at 7:58 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Doug Lea wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
do you plan to add support for class versioning?
Wrong question! :-) "do WE plan..." Harmony is an Apache
project. Apache is a JCP member, and ought to have a rep
on this EG.
well, "you" b
Enrico Migliore wrote:
All new releases of the OSGi framework are, by design, back
compatible with
the previous versions. Therefore, as far as the OSGi framework is
concerned,
the adoption or not of the JSR277 by Sun will be a problem of the
OSGi consortium.
Well, it could be somewhat
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
do you plan to add support for class versioning?
how does this impact service frameworks like OSGi and friends?
That is a good question. So far, the JSR does not comment on OSGi R4,
which basically addresses all of the issues raised. Perha
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
do you plan to add support for class versioning?
how does this impact service frameworks like OSGi and friends?
That is a good question. So far, the JSR does not comment on OSGi R4,
which basically addresses all of the issues raised. Perhaps it is not
mentioned b
Doug Lea wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
>> do you plan to add support for class versioning?
>
>
> Wrong question! :-) "do WE plan..." Harmony is an Apache
> project. Apache is a JCP member, and ought to have a rep
> on this EG.
well, "you" because "we" have nobody in the EG yet ;-)
> But
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
do you plan to add support for class versioning?
Wrong question! :-) "do WE plan..." Harmony is an Apache
project. Apache is a JCP member, and ought to have a rep
on this EG.
But yes, versioning support is in the proposal.
how does this impact service frameworks l
Doug Lea wrote:
> The module system JSR was just posted on JCP
> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=277
>
> This is targeted for J2SE7.
>
> At least someone working on Harmony should be involved.
>
> The JSR proposal doesn't get into mechanics or
> the solution space much, but notice the line:
The module system JSR was just posted on JCP
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=277
This is targeted for J2SE7.
At least someone working on Harmony should be involved.
The JSR proposal doesn't get into mechanics or
the solution space much, but notice the line:
We also expect the Java Module
10 matches
Mail list logo
