PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 6:52 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][vm] Prerequisites for java.util.concurrent
Nathan,
VMI Atomicity/Lock API - All of the AtomicXXX classes are delegated to a
VM-specific API for atomic gets and sets. This API will need
, 2006 6:34 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][vm] Prerequisites for java.util.concurrent
Nathan Beyer wrote:
snip
Does this mean we can stub out the luni-kernel System and just get the
VMs
to implement it in their kernel classes using this method?
That's what I
, including the
PriorityBlockingQueue.
-Original Message-
From: Paulex Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:18 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][vm] Prerequisites for java.util.concurrent
Nathan,
I'm working on the j.u.PriorityQueue
Nathan Beyer wrote:
snip
Does this mean we can stub out the luni-kernel System and just get the VMs
to implement it in their kernel classes using this method?
That's what I was thinking, and we can implement it in the luni-kernel /
classpathadapter as a reference for VMs if we so choose.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:18 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][vm] Prerequisites for java.util.concurrent
Nathan,
I'm working on the j.u.PriorityQueue (harmony-574), but I didn't find
anything related to atomic or lock on this class? The spec
.
-Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 6:34 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][vm] Prerequisites for java.util.concurrent
Nathan Beyer wrote:
snip
Does this mean we can stub out the luni-kernel
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][vm] Prerequisites for java.util.concurrent
Nathan,
I'm working on the j.u.PriorityQueue (harmony-574), but I didn't find
anything related to atomic or lock on this class? The spec on this class
said:
*Note that this implementation is not synchronized
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathan Beyer wrote:
I've been working with the java.util.concurrent code to see what we'd
need
to have in place to get this code to be a part of Harmony.
System.nanoTime() - A number of the classes rely on
