Yea-- I had missed this thread. Sorry for the duplication.
I have now looked at this web page and I like the proposed
concept.
Dan Lydick
> [Original Message]
> From: Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 3/19/06 8:31:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [classl
Dan,
We agreed to use org.apache.harmony as our package name prefixes, and
even refined that with the following guidelines in the class library:
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/pkgnaming.html
Regards,
Tim
Dan Lydick wrote:
> I encourage the use of our name space as
I encourage the use of our name space as "org.apache.harmony"
for three reasons to start out with: (1) simplicity of identification
by _any_ interested party anywhere, and (2) this is the requested
format in Java development guidelines as they have been developed
over the life of the Java languag
don't care either way
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> I changed thread name to keep this issue from getting buried in the
> security2 discussion (and get it out of there...) I also added
> [classlib] in the subject to help people sort things out... I plan to
> use [classlib:security2] for more d
On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed thread name to keep this issue from getting buried in the
> security2 discussion (and get it out of there...) I also added
> [classlib] in the subject to help people sort things out... I plan to
> use [classlib:security2] for mo
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I changed thread name to keep this issue from getting buried in the
security2 discussion (and get it out of there...) I also added
[classlib] in the subject to help people sort things out... I plan to
use [classli
