This contribution was accepted by the Apache Harmony community with
unanimous support, and all documentation is complete. This
contribution and it's contribution information has been placed in the
contrib archive (where it shall remain untouched) :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubato
On Oct 2, 2005, at 6:38 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:18:06PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to
Apache Harmony. It can be found here :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3
[X] +1 Accept the co
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:18:06PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to
> Apache Harmony. It can be found here :
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3
>
> [X] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox
> [ ] -1 D
On Oct 1, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 1, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't referring to the mechanics of voting, but rather
what
was being implied by the response from people on the list.
For example, I'd definitely +1 for
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I wasn't referring to the mechanics of voting, but rather what
>> was being implied by the response from people on the list.
>>
>> For example, I'd definitely +1 for getting relevant code in as seed for
>>
On Oct 1, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't referring to the mechanics of voting, but rather what
was being implied by the response from people on the list.
For example, I'd definitely +1 for getting relevant code in as seed
for
the project,
So did you? :D
so hearing
Sorry, I wasn't referring to the mechanics of voting, but rather what
was being implied by the response from people on the list.
For example, I'd definitely +1 for getting relevant code in as seed for
the project, so hearing about an incoming VM implementation or interface
design is excellent. I
On Oct 1, 2005, at 1:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but
that may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in
Kindergarten. :-)
There
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that
may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in
Kindergarten. :-)
There is no "authoritative source" - projects get to choose th
On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that
may be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in
Kindergarten. :-)
There is no "authoritative source" - projects get to choose the
manner in which they ru
I think we should refer people to the authorative source, but that may
be a general bias on my part due to a game I played in Kindergarten. :-)
I share your opinion on fractional votes...they are annoying and make
counting more difficult. However I don't think this warrants discussion
yet.
That's good background.
If theres something to be added here http://incubator.apache.org/
harmony/guidelines.html, suggest it.
(But I really want to avoid fractional votes. Written comments are
much more expressive and avoid assumptions.)
geir
On Oct 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTE
See this http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Tim Ellison wrote:
Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1
mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope
of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation
(authorized contrubuto
On Oct 1, 2005, at 8:44 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what
does +1
mean from people --
Generally +1 = yes, -1 = no, 0 = "don't care, but I'm telling you
that because I'm paying attention". I hope we can avoid the +0, -0
stuff here.
Great to see this stuff coming in. Just for my education, what does +1
mean from people -- is it simply that the code 'fits' within the scope
of the project? does it mean that the relevant documentation
(authorized contrubutor questionnaire, ICLA, ?) is known to be on file?
Your resolved concern
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 17:43 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement
> found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of
> it being his original work based on exposure to only open-so
+1 code.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
+1 from me
I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement found
in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of it being
his original work based on exposure to only open-source implementations
is fine for me.
Th
+1 from me
I was concerned about the provenance given some of the statement
found in the contribution, but Archie's explanation and statement of
it being his original work based on exposure to only open-source
implementations is fine for me.
This is going into the sandbox - if we happen t
+1 (non-binding)
Dan Lydick
> [Original Message]
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 9/30/05 4:18:14 PM
> Subject: [vote] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-3 : Archie Cobbs'
Contribution of JCVM
>
> Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to
Apache Harmony. It can be found here :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3
[ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox
[ ] -1 Don't accept the code. Reason :
This vote will close
+1 from me.
On 9/30/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Archie Cobbs has offered the JCVM project under the Apache License to
> Apache Harmony. It can be found here :
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the code into the project sandbox
> [ ] -1 Do
21 matches
Mail list logo
