Re: Experiments building security2

2006-01-16 Thread Stepan Mishura
> >Well it isn't the most *complete* bug report I've ever seen ;-) > I thought that our primary goal is 'to marry' contributions together first and after that we'll return to 'daily duties' :-) Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division On 1/16/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Experiments building security2

2006-01-16 Thread Stepan Mishura
>great -- and what problems did you see? Just failing tests :-) The script from security2 runs all unit tests from Intel's contribution. Some of them failed due to different reasons but most of them passed. Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division On 1/16/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL

Re: Experiments building security2

2006-01-16 Thread Tim Ellison
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > Tim Ellison wrote: > >> great -- and what problems did you see? >> >>> cause some tests hang VM >> >> anything else to report? > > That isn't enough for you? ;) Well it isn't the most *complete* bug report I've ever seen ;-) Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Experiments building security2

2006-01-16 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
5) ant tests.run If something unclear or you need more detailed info please let me know. Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division -Original Message- From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:33 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org S

Re: Experiments building security2

2006-01-16 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
to %HY_DEPLOY%\jre 5) ant tests.run If something unclear or you need more detailed info please let me know. Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division -Original Message- From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:33 PM To: harmony-dev@incubat

Re: Experiments building security2

2006-01-16 Thread Tim Ellison
detailed info please let me know. > > Thanks, > Stepan Mishura > Intel Middleware Products Division > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:33 PM >>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org

RE: Experiments building security2

2006-01-16 Thread Mishura, Stepan M
riginal Message- >From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:33 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: Experiments building security2 > >I think the immediate goal should be to make the 'security2' code a >replacem

Re: Experiments building security2

2006-01-13 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Tim Ellison wrote: I think the immediate goal should be to make the 'security2' code a replacement for 'security'. Since security is part of the componentized-build bootstrapping code (i.e. required to run the compiler in self-hosting mode) then we need to integrate the security2 build script

Re: Experiments building security2

2006-01-13 Thread Tim Ellison
I think the immediate goal should be to make the 'security2' code a replacement for 'security'. Since security is part of the componentized-build bootstrapping code (i.e. required to run the compiler in self-hosting mode) then we need to integrate the security2 build script with the classlib/make/

RE: Experiments building security2

2006-01-13 Thread Loenko, Mikhail Y
That is really good news. For the remaining issues we will try to reproduce them and provide a fix. The next steps could be: 1. Closing the issue with Javadocs and updating the sources according to the decision. (There might be both short-term and long-term decisions, like remove tags and provide