>
>Well it isn't the most *complete* bug report I've ever seen ;-)
>
I thought that our primary goal is 'to marry' contributions together first
and after that we'll return
to 'daily duties' :-)
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Middleware Products Division
On 1/16/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>great -- and what problems did you see?
Just failing tests :-)
The script from security2 runs all unit tests from Intel's contribution.
Some of them failed due to different reasons but most of them passed.
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Middleware Products Division
On 1/16/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>> great -- and what problems did you see?
>>
>>> cause some tests hang VM
>>
>> anything else to report?
>
> That isn't enough for you? ;)
Well it isn't the most *complete* bug report I've ever seen ;-)
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
5) ant tests.run
If something unclear or you need more detailed info please let me know.
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
S
to %HY_DEPLOY%\jre
5) ant tests.run
If something unclear or you need more detailed info please let me know.
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubat
detailed info please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:33 PM
>>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
riginal Message-
>From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:33 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Experiments building security2
>
>I think the immediate goal should be to make the 'security2' code a
>replacem
Tim Ellison wrote:
I think the immediate goal should be to make the 'security2' code a
replacement for 'security'.
Since security is part of the componentized-build bootstrapping code
(i.e. required to run the compiler in self-hosting mode) then we need to
integrate the security2 build script
I think the immediate goal should be to make the 'security2' code a
replacement for 'security'.
Since security is part of the componentized-build bootstrapping code
(i.e. required to run the compiler in self-hosting mode) then we need to
integrate the security2 build script with the classlib/make/
That is really good news. For the remaining issues we will try to
reproduce them and provide a fix.
The next steps could be:
1. Closing the issue with Javadocs and updating the sources according to
the decision. (There might be both short-term and long-term decisions,
like remove tags and provide
10 matches
Mail list logo