Various bits snipped...
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:45:35AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> If we are going to do javadoc for java*, and
> we have to to be a serious implementation, I'd
> like to ensure that there's no confusion with
> the spec.
+1 (as in, confusion == bad)
> I'd lik
Leo Simons wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:05:23AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Zsejki Sorin Mikl�s wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Zsejki Sorin Mikl�s wrote:
Doesn't Harmony need Javadoc anyway just in order to be called "Java"?
No. IMO, we should *not* be creating a parallel set of
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 06:05:23AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Zsejki Sorin Mikl?s wrote:
> >Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> >>Zsejki Sorin Mikl?s wrote:
> >>>Doesn't Harmony need Javadoc anyway just in order to be called "Java"?
> >>
> >>No. IMO, we should *not* be creating a parallel set of jav
