On 5 July 2006 at 10:06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
Sorry to interrupt your game,
Umpire, can you get this streaker off the court, please?
:)
:-)
but is there any reason why the jar must have the version number in
the name - it's in the
Sorry to interrupt your game, but is there any reason why the jar must
have the version number in the name - it's in the MANIFEST after all.
Couldn't we just copy it to deploy/jdk/lib/ecj.jar?
After all, we don't put a version number in the names of any other jars?
(We'd still want to allow the
Mark Hindess wrote:
Sorry to interrupt your game,
Umpire, can you get this streaker off the court, please?
:)
but is there any reason why the jar must
have the version number in the name - it's in the MANIFEST after all.
Couldn't we just copy it to deploy/jdk/lib/ecj.jar?
After all, we
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can you get your IDE to invoke ant?
Of course, but do you really want our implementation code to be closely
coupled to Ant?
(please answer with a question, I'm getting into the Wimbledon spirit)
Regards,
Tim
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Indeed not.
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can you get your IDE to invoke ant?
Of course, but do you really want our implementation code to be closely
coupled to Ant?
RIght now it's coupled to a specific version number from eclipse-land
that requires the code itself to change when they
Actually, what about some kind of SPI? Or now that JSR-199 in in public
draft form, anything useful in there?
(There's two more questions 40-love)
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can you get your IDE to invoke ant?
Of course, but do you
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Actually, what about some kind of SPI? Or now that JSR-199 in in public
draft form, anything useful in there?
How would that help? We would still have to name the JAR that contains
those providers wouldn't we?
What do you think about simply adding all jars in jdk/lib
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Indeed not. Should we just use an ant filter and a property to set this?
Does your IDE cope with this? It will require testing exclusively via
Ant I think.
Regards,
Tim
geir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tellison
Date: Fri Jun 30 00:49:45 2006
New
Can you get your IDE to invoke ant?
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Indeed not. Should we just use an ant filter and a property to set this?
Does your IDE cope with this? It will require testing exclusively via
Ant I think.
Regards,
Tim
geir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed not. Should we just use an ant filter and a property to set this?
geir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tellison
Date: Fri Jun 30 00:49:45 2006
New Revision: 418195
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=418195view=rev
Log:
Update compiler impl reference
(should not be hardcoded
10 matches
Mail list logo