Re: svn commit: r419522 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio: .classpath build.xml make/hyproperties.xml src/test/java/common/ src/test/java/common/org/ src/test/java/linux/ src

Hi Mark, From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart from pushing code around the repository and breaking at least one patch (HARMONY-755). It would be great if you or Paulex (and everyone in fact) could comment in the [classlib] Testing conventions - a proposal thread

Re: svn commit: r419522 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio: .classpath build.xml make/hyproperties.xml src/test/java/common/ src/test/java/common/org/ src/test/java/linux/ src

Hi, George I've read that thread, and I agree with you that the test layout is an issue worthing consideration, but before heading into the discussion on test convention(again), I want to have a look at TestNG at first so that I can have more value-add to that thread. But on the other side,

Re: svn commit: r419522 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio: .classpath build.xml make/hyproperties.xml src/test/java/common/ src/test/java/common/org/ src/test/java/linux/ src

On 6 July 2006 at 12:55, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mark, From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart from pushing code around the repository and breaking at least one patch (HARMONY-755). Well, obviously that wasn't my motivation! ;-) From the

Re: svn commit: r419522 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio: .classpath build.xml make/hyproperties.xml src/test/java/common/ src/test/java/common/org/ src/test/java/linux/ src

Mark Hindess wrote: On 6 July 2006 at 12:55, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mark, From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart from pushing code around the repository and breaking at least one patch (HARMONY-755). Well, obviously that wasn't my

Re: svn commit: r419522 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio: .classpath build.xml make/hyproperties.xml src/test/java/common/ src/test/java/common/org/ src/test/java/linux/ src

Mark Hindess wrote: On 6 July 2006 at 12:55, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mark, From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart from pushing code around the repository and breaking at least one patch (HARMONY-755). Well, obviously that wasn't my

Re: svn commit: r419522 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio: .classpath build.xml make/hyproperties.xml src/test/java/common/ src/test/java/common/org/ src/test/java/linux/ src

Paulex Yang wrote: Hi, George I've read that thread, and I agree with you that the test layout is an issue worthing consideration, but before heading into the discussion on test convention(again), I want to have a look at TestNG at first so that I can have more value-add to that thread. Hi

Re: svn commit: r419522 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio: .classpath build.xml make/hyproperties.xml src/test/java/common/ src/test/java/common/org/ src/test/java/linux/ src

On 6 July 2006 at 18:05, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: On 6 July 2006 at 12:55, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mark, From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart from pushing code around the repository and breaking

Re: svn commit: r419522 - in /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio: .classpath build.xml make/hyproperties.xml src/test/java/common/ src/test/java/common/org/ src/test/java/linux/ src

Mark Hindess wrote: On 6 July 2006 at 18:05, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Hindess wrote: On 6 July 2006 at 12:55, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mark, From what I can tell this JIRA hasn't really achieved much apart from pushing code around the