On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gshimansky
Date: Wed Nov 15 14:38:55 2006
New Revision: 475473
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475473
Log:
Allow the test to pass even
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to either side. We can use ulimit -s in
build.sh script which runs tests (maybe only in case it
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to either side. We can use ulimit -s in
build.sh script which runs
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to either side. We can use ulimit -s in
