Ken Sailor writes
| Reginald Meeson writes
|
| > Interesting discussion, but it seems to me that Haskell already
| > provides the best of both worlds, namely
|
| > a. Efficient implementation of arrays as data objects, with indexing
| > as a projection function; and
|
| (Actually, efficien
Subject: Re: Arrays and general functions
Reginald Meeson writes
> Interesting discussion, but it seems to me that Haskell already
> provides the best of both worlds, namely
> a. Efficient implementation of arrays as data objects, with indexing
> as a projection function; and
(Actu
Reginald Meeson writes:
>Interesting discussion, but it seems to me that Haskell already
>provides the best of both worlds, namely
>
> a. Efficient implementation of arrays as data objects, with indexing
> as a projection function; and
>
> b. Definition of functions with (Ix a) domains by i
