Currently, the Haskell language does not mention any libraries or
facilities for using them. The standard prelude is meant to serve as
a library but it lacks many important features. All Haskell
implementations have begun to haphazardly include various libraries.
However, these libraries have
Regarding "A Process for Change":
Simon said:
> I'm not sure we're ready yet to embark on a formal "let's
> design Haskell 2.0" exercise. I favour something a bit more
> informal, perhaps focussed round an annual workshop, in
> which we explore design options. Then, when it's become
> clear wh
Regarding standardization:
My suggestion to standardize Haskell was not a near-term thing,
but rather long-term; in particular there's no sense putting a
lot of effort into standardizing 1.X if we know that 2.0 is less
than a few years away.
In any case, the process is tedious and is guaranteed