It seems that many prominent Haskell people are more or less associated
with Microsoft. It has just been announced that Hugs may go into
Microsoft Developers Studio and Simon Peyton-Jones is about to move to
Microsoft. Is there a risk (or change, if you like) that Microsoft will
eventually take ov
Alastair Reid wrote/a ecrit/skrev:
> > * import-chasing as part of the spec
>
> This is an environment feature not a language feature.
>
> What does it mean for GHC?
> Are you wanting to do away with Makefiles?
> Makefiles can do an awful lot more than import chasing can
> and GNU makefiles are
Tommy Thorn writes:
> I use a lot of Makefiles, but why must we use ugly tools with beatiful
> languages? They are especially bad for a novice, just trying to gain
> a little more speed on his Hugs program.
I agree, which is why I adapted 'hbcmake' and 'nhcmake' to come up with
'hmake' - a comp
Tommy Thorn writes:
> Alastair Reid wrote/a ecrit/skrev:
> > > * import-chasing as part of the spec
> >
> > This is an environment feature not a language feature.
> >
> > What does it mean for GHC?
> > Are you wanting to do away with Makefiles?
> > Makefiles can do an awful lot more than impor
Alex Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
>Sergey Mechveliani writes:>
>> But question aside, on "MPC forces me to use non-variable contexts":
>> its this necessary to represent a Set as a constructor class?
>> Why do not declare
>>class (Foo a,Foo' b) => Set a b where ...
>> ?
Simon L Peyton Jones wrote:
> What worries me is that a programmer might write this:
>
> read2 :: (Read a, Read b) => String -> (a,b)
> read2 2 = let [(r1,s1)] = read s
> [(r2,s2)] = read s1
> in
> (r1,r2)
The examples of
