On 15 Sep, Hans Aberg wrote: > The generalization of the Int type, as I see it, is a binary type, a > sequence of bit of fixed length, which has special operations such as > right/left shift with under/overflow, rotations, signed/unsigned arithmetic > and Boolean bit operations. agreed, though I think there is a strong case of providing most of those operations on Integer too (perhaps at a different type). -- Jon Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Int vs Integer Simon Marlow
- Re: Int vs Integer Keith S. Wansbrough
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Int vs Integer Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Int vs Integer Philip Wadler
- Fwd: Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Simon Marlow
- Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan
- Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan
- RE: Int vs Integer Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Int vs Integer Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Int vs Integer Philip Wadler
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan